Your submission at Articles for creation: EurEau (December 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ahecht was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:48, 16 December 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Caroline1978again, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:48, 16 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:EurEau

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:EurEau, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DGG ( talk ) 00:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

I've seen your message, but I've got to go out soon, so it may be tomorrow before I can take a proper look. I should point out that if the text is copyrighted, it cannot be restored, but I'll obviously check the deleted text before I decide Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reply

edit

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

  • it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Most of your text was unreferenced, and your only sourced text was to your own organisation, obviously not independent. There is a list of bare urls below the text, but I've no idea what they are for since they pbviously aren't in line refs
  • it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. you write about the claimed achievements, but little about the organisation itself. Where is it based? How many employees? how is it funded?
  • The article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
  • You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.


I'm not prepared to restore the deleted text, but if you decide to recreate, I can let you have the code for the table to save you starting from scratch if you don't have a copy Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Year Name Country Secretary general
1975-1977 Albert Achten Belgium Gilbert Bury
1977-1979 Jean-Claude Legrand France
1979-1981 Ernest Reiter the Netherlands
1983-1985 Heinz Tessendorff Germany Francis Rillaerts
1985-1988 Ken Roberts United Kingdom
1988-1990 Germano Bulgarelli Italy
1990-1992 Jean-Pierre Quinio France
1992-1994 Ernest Reiter Luxembourg
1994-1996 Albert Desmed Belgium
1996-1998 Theo Martijn the Netherlands
1998-2000 Ortwin Scholz Germany
2000-2002 Fernando Porta Spain
2002-2003 Pamela Taylor United Kingdom
2003-2004 Michael Phillips Ireland
2004-2005 Anders Baekgaard Denmark Fréderic de Hemptinne
2005-2006 C. Martins Portugal
2006-2007 Mauro d’Ascenzi Italy Pierre-Yves Monette
2007-2008 Daniel Villessot France
2008-2009 Andreas Angelakis Greece
2009-2011 Klara Szatkiewicz Poland
2011- Carl-Emil Larsen Denmark Almut Bonhage

Your submission at Articles for creation: EurEau (January 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:37, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: EurEau (March 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Quasar G. was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Quasar G t - c 13:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:EurEau concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:EurEau, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:EurEau

edit
 

Hello, Caroline1978again. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "EurEau".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply