Carlos Ruiz 112

Your submission at Articles for creation: Travis Meyer (neuroscientist) (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Travis Meyer (neuroscientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Travis Meyer (neuroscientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Carlos Ruiz 112! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi DoubleGrazing! Thanks for the message! Unfortunately I saw this after I had updated the article with the suggestions you left, otherwise I'd have written here first! I appreciate the help, it was very informative and completely made sense! I went through the article and removed all of the data points I knew but couldn't 'prove' with independent data. Maybe in the future someone else with other data/links will be able to fill that info in for him :). This was my first article submission so I appreciate your help!!! Best! Carlos Carlos Ruiz 112 (talk) 14:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Travis Meyer (neuroscientist) (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Travis Meyer (neuroscientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Travis Meyer (neuroscientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Travis Meyer (neuroscientist) (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Travis Meyer (neuroscientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Travis Meyer (neuroscientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Travis Meyer (neuroscientist) (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Travis Meyer (neuroscientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 05:48, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, and thanks for the response, and sorry for the late reply, I've given this a very long time to sit and ponder your comments. I suppose the confusion I keep coming across is as I see other Wikipedia pages that contradict the requirements you used to reject my submission of Draft:Travis Meyer (neuroscientist) For instance, I recently came across this page Emily Willingham which also just sites the persons work, there is one 'shared' award, and all of the publications are merely the subjects, none about the subject, which you stated was one of the main reasons why my draft was rejected. So does this mean we should remove the page of Emily Willingham? Is it possible to go through Wikipedia and to start removing Scientist and Journalist pages that also do not meet this criteria? I'd be happy to help participate in this if this is the case. I'm just confused when I try my best to contribute, and I'm rejected by things I routinely see across Wikipedia. Carlos Ruiz 112 (talk) 02:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Travis Meyer (neuroscientist)

Hello, Carlos Ruiz 112. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Travis Meyer (neuroscientist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to David M. Sabatini

Please read the WP:BLPNAME policy, as it explains why I reverted your edit. Schazjmd (talk) 16:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, that name was published in Science Magazine one of the most widely read magazines in the world, it was widely distributed so the WP:BLPNAME policy does not relate. Carlos Ruiz 112 (talk) 17:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Adding accusser's name to pages that deal with the results of sexual accusations

on the page David M. Sabatini there is a large section describing the effects of sexual accusations on his career and life. This information has been published in the most widely read periodicals, such as New York Times and Science Magazine. Included in these periodicles was the person whom accused David, and the lawsuits, libel and the like, that are ongoing. I included the accusers name in the Wikipedia section, however it was initially removed because WP:BLPNAME, which discusses when to omit and include names. In that policy 'When deciding whether to include a name, its publication in secondary sources other than news media, such as scholarly journals or the work of recognized experts, should be afforded greater weight than the brief appearance of names in news stories.' - and as such Science Magazine is the most widely read scholarly journal in the Scientific arena, and which includes information about the person.

- Therefore Wiki's own policy supports the inclusion of the accusers name in this case, however the last 2 times I've tried to include an edit with the information it has been deleted. How can this be remedied. This seems like a source of accuser-bias in the editorial system, which could be use nefariously to harm the reputation and careers of any accused. Carlos Ruiz 112 (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

You should move this to Talk:David Sabatini. Schazjmd (talk) 22:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

copied to that link. Carlos Ruiz 112 (talk) 16:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

I apologize, I used the wrong wikilink above. I've moved your comment to Talk:David M. Sabatini (the correct article talk page). Schazjmd (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)