Welcome! edit

 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Cahtls! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rubbish computer and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 00:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madeleine Zillhardt (January 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoolSkittle was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CoolSkittle (talk) 03:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT culture in Paris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michou (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Place Harvey-Milk edit

Hello, Cahtls,

Thank you for creating Place Harvey-Milk.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 03:24, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Abishe

I will do it accordingly, trying to improve the page. Thanks !--Cahtls (talk) 11:55, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dolors Altaba for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dolors Altaba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dolors Altaba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ingratis (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Isabel García Lorca moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Isabel García Lorca, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 21:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 3 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allée Claude-Cahun-Marcel-Moore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rambla.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022 edit

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Homosexuality in association football article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 14:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Isabel García Lorca edit

  Hello, Cahtls. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isabel García Lorca, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Isabel García Lorca edit

 

Hello, Cahtls. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Isabel García Lorca".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:58, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Answer edit

Yes. You did source hijacking (fake referencing of sorts). this source (purportedly cited source) does not back up the information you added in any way whatsoever. See also Wikipedia:Cuckoo editing.--Asqueladd (talk) 10:29, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your quick answer @Asqueladd. I am sorry for my mistake. I'm trying to modify the source, do not hesitate to tell me if it is okay fpr you, or not. Saludos. Cahtls (talk) 17:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi again. It's not about "modifying" the source (it would be a bad thing if we could modify the sources: if so, they would not be reliable sources after all). It's about finding a new reliable source verifying the intended addition of information and then citing that source after new bits of added information. Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you @Asqueladd for your explanations. I hope the change I made on the page you created is OK for you now. Kind regards. Cahtls (talk) 18:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
That's the idea. However we may need to ponder on reliability of the third-party source "unión rayo". What is it? A fansite of Rayo Vallecano? I am going to replace that source by this one.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you @Asqueladd! Indeed it is the official website of the Spanish soccer club I found on the web. Your source is better. I hope everything is okay now. Kind regards and thank you again. Cahtls (talk) 18:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Spanish Anti-Francoists edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Spanish Anti-Francoists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I am sorry, I made a mistake creating the category page Category:Spanish Anti-Francoists.
I created first Category:Spanish Anti-Francoist (singular) as the related page in French, but the good way for this kind of category is to use the plural.
I think the two category pages have to be merged, to use only Category:Spanish Anti-Francoists (in the plural), as for the related category in the Spanish Wikipedia.
Sorry again. Cahtls (talk) 16:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
(as for instance Category:British Anti-Francoists and Category:French Anti-Francoists in the plural).
Sorry again for my mistake :-(
Kind regards Cahtls (talk) 17:06, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Basque Antifrancoists edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Basque Antifrancoists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, this page is not empty anymore.
Thank you! Cahtls (talk) 17:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Spanish Anti-Francoist edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Spanish Anti-Francoist indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Liz,
Indeed, this page has to be deleted. The good one for this category is Category:Spanish Anti-Francoists (in the plural).
Thank you ! Cahtls (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Venus de Badalona moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Venus de Badalona. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Cahtls. Thank you for your work on Venus de Badalona. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article. It seems there is more content available online about this sculpture that could be added to the stub. Also the French, Spanish or Catalan Wikipedias may have useable content for expansion.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 15:08, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Republican soldier in Barcelona for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Republican soldier in Barcelona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republican soldier in Barcelona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply