TreeBeard

CabOffice01, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi CabOffice01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, TreeBeard. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Jayron32 18:01, 14 December 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your submission at Articles for creation

Efficiency, Reform and Growth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Pratyya ^{(have a chat?)} 06:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Status and Advice

The inexperienced reviewer should not have accepted this article. As reviewing administrator, I have deleted it under provision CSD G11, blatant promotion that can not be rescued by normal editing. A factual article about the department not devoted to government propaganda, not claiming great successes everywhere they has been working, not written in bureaucratic jargon, and not trying to include the names of as many minor officials as possible, might be acceptable. Someone not connected with Government ought to write it. DGG ( talk ) 02:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization or cause that you consider worthwhile. All users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest; you may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets.

If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. If you prefer to be unblocked for the purpose of changing your username to a username which complies with our username policy, so that your contributions with this username are recorded as contributions of your new username and rather than creating a new account, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice instead. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 02:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)