Your submission at Articles for creation: Professor Tom Greggs (March 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nizolan was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nizolan (talk) 05:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! C.dodsonABDN, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Nizolan (talk) 05:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tips for Draft:Professor Tom Greggs

edit

Hi C.dodsonABDN. I've formatted your draft a bit to bring it into compliance with Wikipedia's General Manual of Style and Manual of Style for Biographies and added the Authority control and a better reference for one of his books. A couple of quick tips for now:

  • Do not refer to the subject by his first name. After the first mention of his full name, use "Greggs" or "he".
  • Linking to Amazon pages is a complete no-no. I've removed those. Technically, you don't need a reference to show that a book exists—the OCLC number is enough—but it's always good to use a review in a journal as a reference as it helps establish the notability of his work. I've added one for his Barth, Origen, and Universal Salvation: Restoring Particularity. I suggest you find one for each of the other books.

I'll check in again tomorrow. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 18:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Me again. I've copyedited and slightly restructured your draft, added references, etc. and accepted the submission. You'll find it at Tom Greggs where you can continue to improve it if you wish. However, avoid making it read like a CV or résumé and don't include every single one of his activities. As you can see, I've pruned some of these and restructured the article somewhat to make it more of a biographical narrative. If you have any questions or need further help, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 11:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much, @Voceditenore:. It all looks great. C.dodsonABDN (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quick note: you shouldn't use thumbnail syntax when you add a picture to an infobox -- just specify the picture directly. You can add a caption with the "caption =" option below, but it should say some more info about the picture rather than just the subject's name again (so "Tom Greggs in 2016"). Another minor point is that according to Wikipedia's Manual of Style, we prefer not to use people's academic titles before their names. Good work on the article. —Nizolan (talk) 15:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Tom greggs.jpg

edit

Hi C.dodson. I'm afraid you're going to have trouble with this image. If it has previously been published under copyright, as it has been on Prof. Greggs's faculty page, then it cannot be uploaded under a Creative Commons license without a special procedure, involving email permission from the photographer. You also state on the file page, that it is "your own work" and that you are the copyright holder. Did you personally take that photograph? If not, then you are not the copyright holder and cannot release the image under a Creative Commons license. Only the copyright holder can do that, and that is almost invariably the photographer. I strongly suggest that you take a picture yourself of Prof. Greggs with your own camera and upload that to Commons. The current one will almost certainly be deleted eventually. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply