User talk:Bruxton/Archives/2023/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bruxton. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2023)
.jpg) Chinese blue and white porcelain jar, Ming dynasty, 15th century
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Motion • Juice Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 2 October 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2023)
 Witch-hunting is commonly motivated by religious superstition.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: The arts • Motion Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 9 October 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2023)
 An IT8.7 Target by LaserSoft Imaging
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Superstition • The arts Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2023)
Hello, Bruxton. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Color calibration • Superstition Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2023)
 Various forms of severe weather
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Power (social and political) • Color calibration Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Points award
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| This award is given to Bruxton for collecting more than 10 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 02:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2023)
Hello, Bruxton. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Severe weather • Power (social and political) Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2023)
 Logo for 3dfx
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Play (theatre) • Severe weather Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2023)
Hello, Bruxton. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: 3dfx • Play (theatre) Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2023)
 Institute for sports science in Japan
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Human-centered design • 3dfx Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
DYK nomination of Lincoln Fitzgerald
Hello! Your submission of Lincoln Fitzgerald at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RoySmith (talk) 03:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
DYK Snowy Plover
Hi Bruxton, thanks for your input in Template:Did you know nominations/Snowy plover. Since that discussion is closed, I am not sure how to respond to your question, so I am responding to you here. I am not quite seeing the problem you pointed out yet. In the original hook, the "often" implies that not all of them are always doing this. The article has an almost identical sentence: Snowy plovers are facultative polygamous, with females, and less frequently males, often abandoning their mate soon after the chicks have hatched. Your alternative (with "some" instead of "often") is technically correct, but gives the impression that this behavior is rather the exception – which is it not, it is very common. Also, "some" implies that some individuals are doing it and others not, which is also not the case: An individual might abandon one brood but stick to it for the next one. Therefore I think that the original variant (with "often") is slightly better. But let me know if is miss something here. Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jens Lallensack: Thanks for the message. I will change the hook to your choice. I will also move this message to the nomination. Bruxton (talk) 17:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jens Lallensack: Bruxton (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Great, thank you! Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jens Lallensack: Bruxton (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)