User talk:Brunoptsem/archive01

Galeão

Olá Bruno! You may be right - I might made a mess whilst trying to clean up; I'll take a look and fix it where needed. As for the routing of flights, if you're listing them in the accidents section, I think it's fine to include the via airports. But, in the main destinations table (where we list currently operating airlines & destinations), we don't say "via". We just list the destinations in alphabetical order. Obrigado! Jasepl (talk) 20:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Aeronorte

It seems we have a problem. According to ASN, an airline called Aeronorte lost a DC-3 in 1973. Looks like I'll have to do some digging here. For the moment, I'll un-link Aeronorte from the 1973 DC-3 crash list. Mjroots (talk) 11:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

dear Mjroots. I find it strange as well. What I know for sure is that Aeronorte was bought and merged into Aerovias Brasil in 1953 which in turn was bought by Varig in 1961 (complicated history). Presently there exists another Aeronorte in Portugal but I reckon it has nothing to do with this accident. On the other hand, Mirituba is a small location in the municipality of Itaituba in Pará, Brazil. My huntch is that Aeronorte some kind of business or development company in the Amazon and this DC-3 was a privatly-owned aircraft. I however was not able to gather further evidence. The mistery continues. BRGDS (Brunoptsem (talk) 12:46, 31 August 2010 (UTC))

Mystery solved as per a kind e-mail from Harro Ranter, the president of ASN. The full name of the company in reference is Aeronorte Indústria e Comércio, being a private company different from the Aeronorte - Empresa de Transportes Aéreos Norte do Brasil mentioned in the wikiarticle. So the article is correct as it is. To avoid future mistakes I will place an explanatory hidden note. Here the transcription: "On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Harro Ranter wrote: Thanks, indeed it was another Aeronorte. A company with the full name Aeronorte Industria e Comercio Ltda. I will correct that. kind regards, Harro Ranter President Aviation Safety Network - an exclusive service of the Flight Safety Foundation hr@aviation-safety.net http://aviation-safety.net" BRGDS (Brunoptsem (talk) 09:41, 13 May 2011 (UTC))

Thanks for solving that one. An edit note seems the perfect solution. Mjroots (talk) 09:57, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Lóide Aéreo Nacional with Bolivian registration numbers

It seems we have a problem. According to ASN, an airline called Aeronorte lost a DC-3 in 1973. Looks like I'll have to do some digging here. For the moment, I'll un-link Aeronorte from the 1973 DC-3 crash list. Mjroots (talk) 11:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

dear Mjroots. I find it strange as well. What I know for sure is that Aeronorte was bought and merged into Aerovias Brasil in 1953 which in turn was bought by Varig in 1961 (complicated history). Presently there exists another Aeronorte in Portugal but I reckon it has nothing to do with this accident. On the other hand, Mirituba is a small location in the municipality of Itaituba in Pará, Brazil. My huntch is that Aeronorte some kind of business or development company in the Amazon and this DC-3 was a privatly-owned aircraft. I however was not able to gather further evidence. The mistery continues. In the past I found some mistakes in the ASN database. I have written to warn them, but no corrections were made. From the top of my head I remember this: http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19510729-0 Note the Bolivian registration number which has nothing to do with the Brazilian defunct airline Lóide Aéreo Nacional... BRGDS (Brunoptsem (talk) 12:46, 31 August 2010 (UTC))

Mystery solved as per a kind e-mail from Harro Ranter, the president of ASN. It seems that CB-39 previously owned by Lloyd Aéreo Boliviano, was bought by Lóide Aéreo Nacional and crashed on the ferry delivery flight, still bearing the Bolivian registration number but owned by the Brazilian airline. Here the transcription: On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Harro Ranter wrote: "I think both your statements are correct. Fleet lists indicate that CB-39 was operated by LAB until it was bought by Lóide Aéreo Nacional a few days before the accident. I therefore assume that it was operating on a ferry flight to its new owner, still wearing the Bolivian registration. Kind regards, Harro Ranter President Aviation Safety Network - an exclusive service of the Flight Safety Foundation hr@aviation-safety.net http://aviation-safety.net" BRGDS (Brunoptsem (talk) 10:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC))

Continental Airlines

There's discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#CO/UA SOC 2011-11-30 and voting in progress for another couple of hours. HkCaGu (talk) 20:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Divinópolis Airport

Thanks for your help with the article, it looks 1000 times better now! Azylber (talk) 12:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Wiki-team work is always cool! (Brunoptsem (talk) 13:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC))

Yeah, definitely!

By the way, one question: in one of the edits you changed the long&lat a little bit, you put the one according to ANAC. The one I had put there, is the one according to Google maps. What I did was, on Google maps I clicked exactly in the centre of the runway, and I obtained the long&lat of that exact spot. You then took it from one of the sources, and the difference was really very small, just a few arc-seconds. What is the recommended criteria for choosing the long&lat? In a previous discussion someone told me: ignore the sources, use the long&lat from Google maps. So I wanted to ask you: is there an official criteria for this? Azylber (talk) 14:21, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Dear Azylber, Good question! I do not know if there is a forum about the issue. The National Civil Aviation Agency of Brazil, known by the acronym ANAC is the Agency of the Brazilian Federal Government responsible for the information of all airports and aviation in Brazil. If I am not mistaken, their airport tables date from 2009. I have been updating the geo-locations of all Brazilian airports to the ones officially used by the Brazilian government. Obviously a Google map is not official. In this sense, I consider them more accurate, even if slightly different from the ones used by Google maps or by World Aero Data (data from 2006). I believe, but I am not sure, they use the control tower as the geo-location point. In Brazil this information is easily available, which is not the case in other countries. So, personally and if available, I would use the official data and reference the source. BRGDS (Brunoptsem (talk) 14:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC))

Ok, perfectly clear, thanks! Azylber (talk) 16:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Tarauacá Airport

I created Tarauacá Airport following the same guidelines that you showed me for Divinópolis Airport and Alegrete Airport. Take a look! Azylber (talk) 18:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Dear Azylber, Thanks for advising. I made a few enhancements, which will make the information about the airport more thorough. Great team work! BRGDS, (Brunoptsem (talk) 11:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC))

About Iberia flights in Uruguay

Hi Brunoptsem, actually the source I provided [1] says BQB will (not 'may') take over the flights that Iberia is quitting. So I think it is informative to add this somewhere in the article, if not in the table. Hoverfish Talk 15:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Obrigado Brunoptsem. Tenha um bom dia. Hoverfish Talk 15:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

To be honest the prospect of a relatively small company taking over such transatlantic flights, which are almost always filled to the last seat sounds overly ambitious, but the statement is there, the information is certainly critical for thousands of passengers, myself included, so I include it and will wait to see how it works out. After all I come from a country where overambitious statements are made all the time, followed by big delays and modifications (including cancelations). Cheers. Hoverfish Talk 15:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Borba Airport

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Borba Airport, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Telêmaco Borba Airport. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Two different airports: tag removed from Borba Airport.Brunoptsem (talk) 23:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Rio de Janeiro–Galeão International Airport page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Corrected (Brunoptsem (talk) 21:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC))

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Brunoptsem. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Iain Torrance, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Your edit summary stated: "Text updated according to Dr. Torrance´s directions". I have therefore reverted your edits as they suggest a strong conflict of interest. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 10:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TwoFlex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paraná (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Corrected Brunoptsem (talk) 11:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Almeirim Airport

Hi Bruno, thanks for your contribution to Almeirim Airport! Could you help me convince User:Lineslarge not to delete that page? The discussion is ongoing on User talk:Denis.arnaud#Proposed deletion of Almeirim Airport Denis.arnaud (talk) 18:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Done, thanks for creating the article. Regional aviation in Brazil is undergoing a boom, and Almeirim is part of it. (Brunoptsem (talk) 22:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC))

Maués Airport

Hi, you changed the coordinates back to the ones given in the source. But actually they are less accurate. I'm not going to change anything again but you might check the marked location on the map and decide which of both coordinates is showing the airport and which one is a tree in the forest :) best regards --Grullab (talk) 21:10, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear Grullab, thanks for your kind warning. You are very right. Back in January, 2021 I changed the coordinates to match the data provided by the National Civil Aviation Agency (057°42'44W 03°21'25S), which are obviously incorrect. I have changed to a more accurate one (057°43'29W 03°22'20S), which equals your change. I even checked whether a new airport had been built or if a new technlogy of airports on top of trees had been created (LOL). But these are not the case. Best Regards, (Brunoptsem (talk) 21:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC))

Actually it often happens that those official coordinates are not quite accurate. Maybe it's accurate enough for them, but we are better. :D best regards --Grullab (talk) 15:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Airports in Sergipe

Template:Airports in Sergipe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

SBVT Airport Elevation

Hello, I have seen conflicting information for SBVT airport for its elevation. The latest AIP AMDT as of 04NOV21 has its elevation at 10 meters while the AISWEB site has it at 10 feet. Do you know how to officially find out the correct value?

Thank you 2600:1011:B12C:65BB:4449:1D56:CA62:2CD2 (talk) 13:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello Usertalk, thanks for your message. According to the Brazilian National Civil Aviation Agency, the elevation of SBVT is 3 meters or 10 feet. This is reference number 3 in the article and this is the link https://www.anac.gov.br/acesso-a-informacao/dados-abertos/areas-de-atuacao/aerodromos/lista-de-aerodromos-publicos-v2 . I would consider this information as the official. Apparently AIP AMDT has a mistake and AISWEB is right. (Brunoptsem (talk) 00:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC))

MAP

o que lhe garante que a MAP MAP Linhas Aéreas ainda exista ? para mim é defunct, pois acabo de ver uma foto dos 1988 ATR 42-300 MAP PR-MPN & PR-MPO deceptados e abandonados em manaus e estou confuso, pq vc colocou os vôos todos como terminados e passoua a voepass e absorvida pela gol. ATR 72 ainda ? nada achei. ATR-500 ? nada achei. 92.76.156.249 (talk) 21:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Dear IP, In reply to your question, and regardless of the fact that you consider it defunct, the National Civil Aviation Agency of Brazil considers it active. Therefore, I can garantee that MAP still exists. The proof is that it has a valid CNPJ (taxation number) 10.483.635/0001-40 but also, and above all, its Air operator's certificate was renewed by Decision (Portaria) 8601 of July 15, 2022. It might not have aircraft under its name but it can be an operational decision of its owner Gol Linhas Aéreas SA. (Brunoptsem (talk) 13:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC))

Aeroporto Fotaleza ... o atualize, seu trabalho você nada o está fazendo direito

Oi Bruno, você que tem as rédias do artigo e se acha dono do mesmo, impedindo que eu deixe-o em ordem e mais bem feito, realize seu trabalho e atualize

1. Ponha a foto antiga, confome aqui https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeroporto_Internacional_de_Fortaleza

2. Atente que Gol nada tem mais Hub em Fortaleza, cancelou vários vôos. Perdeu financeiramente o interesse https://diariodonordeste.verdesmares.com.br/opiniao/colunistas/igor-pires/hub-falho-e-limitado-gol-reduz-pela-metade-voos-em-fortaleza-e-abre-espaco-para-concorrentes-1.3344265

3. Conforme está sabendo do Master Plan da segunda fase aprovado pela ANAC, em que eu sugeri nas Ouvidorias tanto deles como do Ministério do Aeroportos e Presidente Luiz Inácio Da Silva, vale atentar para pôr uma pincelada desses projetos https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=254008

4. Seria interessante que fizesse um artigo tabela com as inúmeras aeronaves abandonadas no Brasil há anos. https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=254017

No mais boa sorte 90.186.249.181 (talk) 13:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Gol Transportes Aéreos destinations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gol Transportes Aéreos destinations, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gol Transportes Aéreos destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)