Bragdonite

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bragdonite/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 03:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Bragdonite, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 03:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Arthur Dyson (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 00:27, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Arthur Dyson a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you.  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 12:00, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur Dyson (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Hefre's why"

The article is much too detailed. It should mention the most important aspects of his work, not discuss each feature of every building individually. Remove phrases expressing quality or excellence--the material presented should show it in plain language. He;'s highly notable, and there is no need to explain everything. Try summarizing it in about half the space, and resubmit.

• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

DGG ( talk ) 03:38, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Working in the Wikipedia Ecosystem Suggestion

Hi! I've been following your conversation with DGG. I thought I'd chime in. Could you consider splitting your article? Perhaps the bio and Works of Arthur Dyson—or another partition? (Best you consult with DGG as he is much more knowledgable than I.)

To my mind, Wikipedia is much more and much less than a committee. It's activist in freeing knowledge, but uses consensus in building articles. Ponderous, but productive.

I hope you will contribute more articles here—a few short ones next, to get a feel for the process. — Neonorange (talk) 09:43, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

I don't really see the advantage of beginning with a split. I think the best way, and the usual way that articles on artists and other creative people are written, would be a single article, with appropriate emphasis on the most important works and influences, and possibly a mere list of other substantial works. After that, it would be a good idea to expand, but I'd suggest doing it as individual articles on the very most important buildings, taking care that their importance is shown in our customary way by reference to published sources from other people that discuss them in a substantial manner. DGG ( talk ) 21:21, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur Dyson has been accepted

Arthur Dyson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 18:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

I know you;re still working on it, but it is certainly satisfactory now, I moved it to mainspace, and you can work on it further there. The main thing that is needed is specific citation for every element in the professional work sections for the different decades, -- look for sentences implying judgments and see if they are actually needed. DGG ( talk ) 18:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Portrait of Arthur Dyson.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of Arthur Dyson.jpg, which you've attributed to A VRT notice was applied over 30 day(s) ago, but no message at VRTS has been found since this tag was applied.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)