User talk:Bobo192/Archive 7

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Shiliang in topic Hu Jintao Page

Welcome to my talk page. I tend to quote your messages back any time you send me, in the format as below. I will always respond to any queries you leave here on your own talk page.


On User talk:Bobo192, ABC said:
message





Ray Benson edit

Changes made to Ray Benson's page are factual, especially the one about the funeral - it is true and factual. This is supposed to be about facts, not if they are nice or not.

apology edit

Hi, I just wanted to apologize for my edit on the nuclear stockpile page. I was trying to demonstrate to someone that Wikipedia information could not be blindly considered proof by changing the article and rolling it back a second later, but over the argument forgot to roll it back (and in retrospective I should not have done it in the first place). So, again, sorry for the screwup, and thank you for taking your time to keep Wikipedia free from morons such as myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.197.16.22 (talk) 03:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

revert edit

Why did you revert my contribution to Bogoliubov Transformation mid way through my edit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.128.48 (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries edit

Hi Bobo192,

I'm aware that you are a well established editor and administrator but I just wanted to inform you that I think it would be appreciated if you provided more detailed edit summaries than the automatic edit summaries when reverting edits. For example, you reverted an edit quite some time ago on Kicking Horse Resort (diff) without any rationale in the edit summary. The revert had little significance but I think it would be appreciated, especially by the editors that you are reverting, if you provided more detailed edit summaries.

On the specific case of Kicking Horse Resort, no action needs to be taken. This is just a friendly comment.

Thanks for your time, Billscottbob (talk) 04:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ringo Starr / infobox edit

There appears to be some controversy brewing re. the infobox in the Ringo Starr article. I just wanted to suggest that the infobox should contain (as it now does again) the name "Ringo Starr", as he is commonly known, and certainly not ever "Ringo Starkey", as he is never known.

The name issue has been discussed enough; check the discussion page, I think you'll find some info there. His birth name is Richard Starkey, but the name by which he is known is Ringo Starr.

Jtnet (talk) 11:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Xen edit

Thanks. I was just seeing if you were paying attention ;) Thanks and regards. —Moondyne 03:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Tip of the day/March 24 edit

Hi there, The Transhumanist. It's good to make contact with you after having watched you work for so long in so many areas of the project.

I do have a question regarding the link I have provided, and I don't wish to act until I know I'm either doing the right thing or entirely the wrong thing. March 24's Tip of the day implies in the header that transclusion and inclusion are two different things, but the tip itself implies that the opposite of transclusion is separate from substitution, and analogous to inclusion. I hope that with your say-so, the heading should be changed to read Transclusion vs. Substitution. Bobo. 22:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

That would be good. "Transclusion" and "inclusion" mean the same thing, so the tip title needs to be fixed. Thank you for spotting that. And it's nice to meet you. The Transhumanist 22:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Greetings and Help? edit

Hi, I am a new user and I see a page where you recently made some changes which appears vandalized.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonial_history_of_New_Jersey

If you scroll down to the "New Sweden" entry, some childish person has inserted some anti-wiki rubbish. Why didn't I fix it? Well, the vandalism seems to have survived a few reversions including your own, and I am a total newb here. I hoped if I brought it to someone who is knowledgeable, they could fix it better than I. I so far confine myself to fixing typos.

Thank you kindly for your time,

~ Ron —Preceding unsigned comment added by SilverbackRon (talkcontribs) 06:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

!תודה edit

Thanks for the revert on my userspace! :) Sometimes I wish changes to one's userpage popped up a banner, too... Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 18:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:F1 Newsletter Issue 1 edit

Hey, this is the first edition of the WP F1 newsletter. If you want to keep getting it, please talk back on my talk page.

Enjoy!LB22 (talk) 11:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

RC-0722 edit

  The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for fixing my userpage. It's nice to know someone is keeping an eye out for me. RC-0722 communicator/kills

I have a feeling I know who it is. I'm not exactly the most popular kid at my school, if you catch my drift. RC-0722 communicator/kills 19:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yup. I'm just glad I'm fast. LOL RC-0722 communicator/kills 19:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reverted message edit

Not to be rude, but please don't remove comments that aren't attacks from my talk page. Thanks, Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 01:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Cowardly Lion (talk) 02:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Warning users after vandalism edit

Hey I notice you do some good vandal-watching but it is important to warn users after they vandalize pages, as typically we can only go to AIV after they've been handed first, second, third, and fourth-level warnings. (Twinkle is a great way to easily warn users). Thanks! xenocidic (talk) 21:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh darn edit

You just grey listed me! :0 74.133.9.95 (talk) 01:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ahh don't worry about it. It happens! 74.133.9.95 (talk) 01:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reverting edit

Please review the revision history of Monarch butterfly. You reverted one vandal, but the version you reverted to was also vandalized. Please try to make sure you don't do this again. An IP seems to have picked up on it and completed the reversion. Thanks. Richard001 (talk) 07:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mmbabies edit

Please note the talk page you moved from talk space to mainspace at 51st Marine Expeditionary Unit was a false copy of 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit created by the community banned user Mmbabies because he seems to be in love with the number 51 and he uses talkspace to get around RC patrollers and keep his nonsense on longer. No harm, no foul, but created false material is part of his modus and I'm sure it was inadvertent on your part. Make sure to note this next time a situation like this pops up. Thank you. Nate (chatter) 05:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Flipback edit

Thank you :). CWii(Talk|Contribs) 00:49, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agian, Thanks :). CWii(Talk|Contribs) 01:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Chef At Home edit

I am just wondering why the article on Chef At Home was deleted? Mr. C.C. (talk) 06:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I was asking as you were the one who deleted the article. Chef at Home is a cooking show on Food Network Canada.
The way the article sounds in my head is promotional. So, I will have to work that out. But yeah, you answered my question sufficiently. Mr. C.C. (talk) 17:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

IP edit

I reverted what appeared to be a pretty random message left on this talk page a minute ago. If you can understand it, please feel free to go ahead and put it back, but it seemed extremely random to me.   jj137 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not a problem. He just left a similar message on my talk page.   jj137 (talk) 03:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism edit

Hi, I noticed you reverted a few vandalism from Special:Contributions/12.226.91.61 if you want, for future vandalism reverts, you can give the user Vandalism warnings to help get him or her blocked quicker. If you have any other questions, let me know! Ctjf83Talk 04:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Thank you for reverting vandalism in my talk page. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to add my thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page! TheProf | Talk 19:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Expired redlinks edit

Thanks for your comments on my talk page, but its actually User:Chandlerjoeyross who produced those charts. Regards, WWGB (talk) 03:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hattersley edit

Could you please look at this article? The same IP address has made a lot of edits and I'm having a hard time sorting out what is legit and what isn't. Thanks for your help! Tnxman307 (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Yeah, a lot of the information seemed like a personal opinion or just nonsense. I just didn't want to do a mass revert and accidentally remove good info. Thanks for checking into that. Tnxman307 (talk) 18:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thank you for all the reverts on my user page and talk page i really appreciate it.

Staffwaterboy Talk 04:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ditto for mine. Trekphiler (talk) 01:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Berkeley Law School edit

May I ask why you reverted the changes I made to the Boalt Hall page? As far as I am concerned (and I am an alumnus from this school and I am financially supporting it), the official name of the school is now Berkeley Law. Boalt Hall is to be used only among students/alumni/faculty. Outside, the short name is Berkeley Law. The name of the school for Wikipedia should therefore be Berkeley Law http://www.law.berkeley.edu/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.203.176.227 (talk) 15:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


No problem Bobo... can you please make sure the changes are taken in consideration? I must say I am not an Wiki expert and it seems the Boalt Hall pages still does not direct to the Berkeley Law page... thanks 194.203.176.227 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Jeff Probst discussion edit

Hello. As a recent editor of the Jeff Probst article, I'd like to invite you to share your opinion in the Talk:Jeff Probst#Born 1961 or 1962 discussion I have initiated. -- Tcncv (talk) 02:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Grief: carer vs caregiver edit

I sincerely apologize. I must be more careful. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

TOTD edit

Note that we have the TOTD department set up around the "yearless year". That means the same pages are used year after year. Sometime after the first of the year, the entire yearless year is copied to archive pages to preserve a historical record of the tips displayed over the past year. 2007 has been copied/archived, which means you can change the yearless year pages any way you want (replace tips with new ones, change their order, etc.) - but not those that have already passed (unless you copy/archive them first - they need to be copied to 2008's archive before replacing them with 2009's tips). The links to the archives are included at the bottom of the main TOTD page. The Transhumanist 01:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Does that make sense?  :) The Transhumanist 01:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

New Project edit

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Josh Coulthurst edit

You're welcome. If you'd like a reference, the 1920 Wisden had the following in the Notes by the Editor: "I have no wish to pat myself on the back or exult unduly over the abandonment of the two-day scheme in county cricket. I felt sure the experiment--hastily determined on--would not answer, the objections to it being so obvious. It was doomed before the season had run half its course, and in August the Advisory Committee decided unanimously to go back to three-day matches in 1920." See [1] JH (talk page) 17:43, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

endorsements edit

I saw that you removed all the hidden endorsements from the campaign articles so I decided to put them all back. I am not trying to derail your work it is just my opinion that the lists look more encyclopedic when they are concealed and not out in the open. Perhaps you have a good rationale for your changes, and I would like to discuss this but I don't know where the proper forum for that would be.--William Saturn (talk) 04:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am sure this was discussed in the past but it is now probably deep in the talk page archives of some article. According to [2] & [3] there seems to be a long standing consensus and favorablity toward the hidden endorsement lists.--William Saturn (talk) 21:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Marking revert minors edit

Hi, when reverting vandalism could you mark edit as non-minor? This helps, because some users configure watchlists to filter minor edits. Nevertheless, you are doing a good job here - thanks. --Kubanczyk (talk) 11:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Raceland (Race track) edit

I did a revert after you but I think we were both trying to revert the same edits. Not sure which version is better. [4] --Faradayplank (talk) 02:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

A "piped" one edit

I do not wish to insult anyone with the "animals" link (which you recently deleted) on The Celtic Song. The purpose of Wikipedia is to provide information. This is valid information, just like the other links in the middle of the songs: Scottish Cup, Celtic Park etc.

Please do not deny others what could be considered useful information, no matter how unpleasant. 70.90.198.172 (talk) 02:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rollback edit

Hello. No reply necessary, just to let you know that your rollback on Einstein (US-CERT program)‎ was reverted because the anonymous user was entirely correct. —SusanLesch (talk) 05:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yep, the page is fine (and I hope remember too to check how far back I am rolling). It just happened that what that user added is probably the only information the public will have about Einstein 2. I'm happy to find out it was published. Thanks for your note. —SusanLesch (talk) 18:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Tom Burrows edit

Thanks for the heads-up. : - ) --MZMcBride (talk) 03:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! edit

Thanks for this [5]! – ukexpat (talk) 02:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

No Proble edit

No problem:-) You're doing a nice job fighting vandalism tonight, BTW:-) Keep up the good work!--SJP (talk) 00:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lebanon Raceway "spam links" edit

Not quite sure what you were doing by removing the website links to the official web site at Lebanon Raceway as well as that of the Warren County Fair. Neither would qualify as spam links, as you indicated in your edit comment. They were improperly formatted, which I have fixed. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Movie Man 07 edit

Hello, I noticed that you reverted the page on St. Theresa Catholic Secondary School. Everything that I had added was true and reliable, as there were citations. You could be very helpful by reverting the vandalism by an unknown user who repedatly puts his name "Dan Blair" & self image on existing images and in the article. I hope you can help with this as I see you have reverted vandalism on other articles, it would be appreciated.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Movie Man 07 (talkcontribs) 19:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bot? edit

Are you by any chance a bot? The only reason I ask this is because you have very bot-like efficiencey. 141.157.165.115 (talk) 02:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

How could you possibly work that fast? There's no way you could identify and correct so many vandalisms in so little time. You must be using some type of bot to do all that. 141.157.165.115 (talk) 02:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tis great edit

 
Hey Bobo, it's so great to always see you on vandal patrol. I know that when one has as many barnstars as you, that they can get redundant, but you deserve this nonetheless. Thanks for your efforts towards protecting our encyclopedia. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 01:20, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


Wow. Thank you for the barnstar, I am touched, particularly from a user I regard so highly as yourself. I am highly appreciative of your gift. Bobo. 01:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why thank you, I appreciate that you appreciated it. I'm also appreciative of the fact that you regard me highly, as I regard you in the same light. Cheers. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 01:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: edit

Please read the message i left to your fellow recent change patroller. the pov troll you are supporting will undoubtedly love you, but can you do me a favour and read the talk page and history also. And then as a gesture of good will, revert yourself. Thanks. 88.239.86.113 (talk) 10:03, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Sorry to be a bit rude, but the way i'm being treated is despicable. i hope you understand that. 88.239.86.113 (talk) 10:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


Hi a question edit

Hi a person from IP 74.184.195.244 is making fake things and infos in the page Catherine Siachoque and this must end. I can't let this person destroy the work I have done creating the page with correct information. please help.


please this person don't stop is making more fake things on the page all the time new fake things. make something with him or her I' ve undoing it's fake corrections but til when I have to do this this person doesn't stop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Siachoquero (talkcontribs) 21:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Please Help! edit

Please help with en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Johnson_(MC)/(Entrepreneur)


This was set up to document the career and life of this artist. It —Preceding comment added by (talk •) 00:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Thank you very much edit

with the vandal disturbing Catherine Siachoque page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Siachoquero (talkcontribs) 08:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sir Frank Cyril Hawker edit

I think you will find that Sir Cyril Hawker died at Etchingham, East Sussex. He was at Hadlow Lodge, Nursing Home. Sir Cyril was a former president of Blackboys Cricket Club and his wife Lady Hawker is still a patron, she still lives at Etchingham. Sir Cyril was also involved heavily with the setting up of the National Playing Fields Association. Can you verify as to whether (this) Sir Cyril Hawker was involved with the Bank of England and also with the M.C.C. --CorporalJones (talk) 06:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. I was merely working from the source which I was using to write the article (the same as the external link at the bottom) which claims he was born in Epping and died in Hastings. If you have any evidence to the contrary, please cite this in the article, While I can't personally verify that the same Cyril Hawker was with the Bank of England, I would be interested to see if this information was available somewhere — and seeing that you know more about this than I do, I wonder if you are able to tell me whereabouts to look for this information.

Thank you for contacting me, it's always interesting to me to see if accepted information is able to be challenged by evidence elsewhere.

Hello

To be fair, I don't know that much. I am the current secretary of Blackboys Cricket Club and in my records, I have correspondence (postcard) from Sir Cyril Hawker in 1990 his address is Etchingham. Likewise, in 1991 I have correspondence from Lady Hawker expressing thanks for our sympathy with regards to Sir Cyril's death. In her note, she mentions his connection with the National Playing Fields Association. I don't know anything about the Bank of England; however a google search seem to indicate a connection. I am trying to find out information on my club and past personnel. Hence, my contact with yourself.

You will have to excuse me, as I am new to wiki procedures - not too sure how to cite this sort of information correctly.

Thnaks for your time. --CorporalJones (talk) 11:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Colonel H W Vaughan Thomas another former president of Blackboys Cricket Club in 1964 played one first class match for Glamorgan. Although I cannot find a wikipedia entry for him. see http://content-www.cricinfo.com/england/content/player/22180.html --193.108.73.47 (talk) 07:53, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks a lot for your recent reversion of vandalism in the Private (novel series) article. I get tired of keeping an eye on it, and I appreciate your help there. --James26 (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Najib Tun Razak edit

Dear Bob K,

You have been quite free to edit Najib Tun Razak's wiki. I would like to remind your, regarding the wiki for Najib Tun Razak, personal blogs CANNOT be used as source. There have been sufficient explanation regarding this on the talk page, please do proceed to the talk page and indulge in a healthy debate with me if you do feel that citing personal blogs is in line with wikipedia's policy on the biography for living people. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.53.27.4 (talk) 18:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Najib Tun Razak edit

Najib Tun Razak

Dear Bobo192,

You have been quite free to edit Najib Tun Razak's wiki. I would like to remind your, regarding the wiki for Najib Tun Razak, personal blogs CANNOT be used as source. There have been sufficient explanation regarding this on the talk page, please do proceed to the talk page and indulge in a healthy debate with me if you do feel that citing personal blogs is in line with wikipedia's policy on the biography for living people. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.53.27.4 (talk) 18:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet Report on Lycianaff1 edit

Hi Bobo192! How are things going?

Just asking if you can review the sockpuppet case on Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Lycianaff1. Regards, ~ Troy (talk) 00:43, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK. I guess I should ask someone else then. Thanks, ~ Troy (talk) 00:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Indeed. Although you don't have much experience regarding sockpuppetry, I have to say, you have done excellent work on those vandals. Recently, I've gained an interest in that area, although I'm not quite an "expert" or 24/7 vandalism reverter (not yet at least ;D). Nice job. ~ Troy (talk) 01:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hu Jintao Page edit

Thank you for fighting vandalism of this biography by reverting inappropriate edits made by 71.64.14.50. This page really needs to be locked for editing.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiliang (talkcontribs) 03:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply