Bluesmanpaul

Copyright problems with User:Bluesmanpaul/Twice As Good

Hello. Concerning your contribution, User:Bluesmanpaul/Twice As Good, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.twiceasgood.org/id3.html. As a copyright violation, User:Bluesmanpaul/Twice As Good appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. User:Bluesmanpaul/Twice As Good has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at User talk:Bluesmanpaul/Twice As Good and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at User talk:Bluesmanpaul/Twice As Good with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on User talk:Bluesmanpaul/Twice As Good.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 02:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

I am Paul Steward. Owner of all copyrights associated with Twice As Good, I am the leader of Twice As Good. I give permission to wikepedia and myself to repost the biography of Twice As Good from the offical band website to wikipedia. The reason for this is they are now a musical artist featured on Lala.com and need to have their image and biography first on wikipedia before it can be uploaded to Lala.com. Thank you. Paul Anthony Steward 02:38, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

In order to verify that you have the rights to the material, please follow the procedures at Wikipedia:CP#Copyright_owners_who_submitted_their_own_work_to_Wikipedia. Woogee (talk) 02:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Twice As Good 2XG

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Twice As Good 2XG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hairhorn (talk) 00:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Twice As Good

A tag has been placed on Twice As Good requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 18:23, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Twice As Good. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Topher385 (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Twice As Good

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Twice As Good, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
• It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 00:58, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

How to contact other users

If you wish to leave notes for other users, do so on their respective user talk pages. In your case, you would contact the original deleting administrator of the Twice As Good article by posting your message on User talk:UninvitedCompany. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 01:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Twice As Good article

I would first read the general notability guideline. If a topic fails this guideline, its article is likely to be deleted, so first make sure that your band meets the guideline before trying to write another article on Twice As Good. In the case that it does meet the general notability guideline, you would have to cite sources in the new article showing that Twice As Good meets the guideline (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for how to do this). However, because you're a member of the band, you'd have to be very careful to remain neutral (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest). As long as you remain neutral and cite some good, reliable sources, the article should be kept. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 15:42, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Twice As Good concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Twice As Good, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 05:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Twice As Good

Hello Bluesmanpaul. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Twice As Good.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Twice As Good}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Bluesmanpaul, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 00:32, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Twice As Good (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Twice As Good.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:22, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Reply to your message on my talk page

There is a complicated history here, that has taken me some time to understand.

In September 2011 you submitted Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Twice As Good. That was declined because it did not show how the band was notable. There is a notice above on your talk page telling you that, and saying "Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved", but you did nothing more with that, and two years later it was flagged for deletion as an abandoned draft. That is the one I deleted.

Clicking on Twice As Good shows directly-submitted articles deleted in 2010 and 2012 by other administrators.

Now, this year, you have made User:Bluesmanpaul/Twice As Good and Draft:Twice As Good.

The 2011 version that I deleted can be restored if you like, but I see no point because you have the more up-to-date Draft:Twice As Good. That is the one you should work on.

You are evidently one of the band. One point I should make clear is that Wikipedia is not intended as a place for people to write about themselves or their own affairs. That is not forbidden, but it is discouraged because of the issue of WP:Conflict of interest - your interest is to promote your band, ours is a neutral and reliable encyclopedia about notable subjects. Please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. In summary, you should not post articles about yourself or your band directly. Use the "Draft" route, as you are now doing, so that what you write can be reviewed by an uninvolved user. The message just above this tells you that the draft has been declined, but invites you to improve it and re-submit,

Read WP:Your first article and WP:Notability for advice, and the standard for bands explained at WP:BAND. What is needed is references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" that explain how you meet the standard of WP:BAND. Do the best you can and then re-submit the draft. It will not be deleted as long as it seems to be making progress, but it will not be accepted until it meets Wikipedia's standards. Be careful not to write in a promotional tone, or make unsourced claims: what is required is not opinions, only plain facts, neutrally stated and cited to reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 22:01, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

More links

I promised you more links to help you write an article. Most of what you need is in the message above, but also:

• WP:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source."
• WP:Writing better articles
• User:Uncle G/On notability#Writing about subjects close to you

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:24, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Twice As Good

Hello Bluesmanpaul. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Twice As Good".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Twice As Good}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Twice As Good

Hello, Bluesmanpaul. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Twice As Good".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Twice As Good

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Twice As Good has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://twiceasgood.org/bio. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. DanCherek (talk) 23:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)