Welcome! edit

Hello, BlackoutDTLA, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kiss Me Kill Me, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 21:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kiss Me Kill Me edit

 

The article Kiss Me Kill Me has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM with no secondary sources or awards, etc.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 21:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 20:46, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! BlackoutDTLA, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:46, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wiae /tlk 22:08, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:BlackoutDTLA/sandbox. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Your repeated resubmission of a sandbox containing only an infobox is tendentious. You may be blocked if you continue. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hi Robert -- I am not in a dispute with anyone. I am simply trying to get as much accurate information onto this article page as possible. This is the first time I have actively or more extensively used wikipedia and if I perhaps am having a bit of a rocky start with it . Please forgive me! I think most of my issues or difficulties have involved adding the info box -- which I think I finally figured out. Regardless, thanks so much for your feedback and help!

You may not be in a dispute with anyone. However, your repeated submissions of just an infobox have been disruptive. If you don't understand why an infobox should not be submitted at AFC, please ask at the Teahouse. If you are trying to build the infobox in order to add it to a draft article on the film, please put it in the draft article on the film. The issue is not with difficulties involving the infobox. The issue is with the concept of submitting what is just an infobox as a draft article. If you don't understand that, please explain at the Teahouse what you are trying to do, and the regulars will advise on how to do what you are trying to do, or whether to do something else. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:"Kiss Me, Kill Me" movie poster.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:"Kiss Me, Kill Me" movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:"Kiss Me, Kill Me" poster.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:"Kiss Me, Kill Me" poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:18, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Such Good People Blu-Ray.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Such Good People Blu-Ray.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Such Good People Los Angeles Premeire.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Such Good People Los Angeles Premeire.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

David Michael Barrett edit

Hi BlackoutDTLA, and welcome to Wikipedia editing. Collaborative editing is sometimes chaotic, and apologies for editing David Michael Barrett at the same time as you – I'll leave off for now and let you finish the wikilinking, etc.

I thought I'd pass on a hint from many years of WP editing: when I create a new article, I work on it in Notepad until it's pretty well finished, doing quick previews in Wikipedia periodically without saving it. That way I avoid other editors "jumping on" a half-written unreferenced "work in progress" and deleting it before I get a chance to type the rest in. I find this offline approach much better for my sanity (and blood pressure), and I can keep other editors out until I'm happy with the article.

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I know there seem to be a lot of rules, but hope you soon feel at home here. If you need help with anything, do feel free to drop a note on my talk page. Regards — Hebrides (talk) 21:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:David Michael Barrett.jpg edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:David Michael Barrett.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Majora (talk) 23:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 5 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Michael Barrett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kiss Me, Kill Me. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello BlackoutDTLA, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Bad Actress has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 02:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Michael Barrett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kiss Me, Kill Me. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Forbidden: Undocumented and Queer in Rural America. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Michael Barrett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kiss Me, Kill Me. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, BlackoutDTLA. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, BlackoutDTLA. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply