Bfposner2

This is Bfposner2's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

A belated welcome!

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bfposner2! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking the time to review this draft. I will make modifications and resubmit. Please note that the YouTube references are to the composer's own channel - "SpecialEditions999". See https://avantmusicnews.com/2021/08/06/rip-andrew-violette/ . Bfposner2 (talk) 14:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Violette (October 31)

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

There is much work to do.

First let us look at what we need form referencing. For a living or recently deceased person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

This means that Discogs as a deprecated source must go, as must Bandcamp and Youtube (unless it is Violette's own verified channel)

"among other venues.[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]" is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.

All inline links should be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. See Wikipedia:External links

The huge quotes are inappropriate. See WP:QUOTE for your guide. Brevity is best. You are using huge quotes to replace text.

Please see WP:NOTMEMORIAL, for this appears to be a memorial, not an encyclopaedic article. Some rewriting is required here.

Please resubmit once you have handled this large slice of work. Its a great start, but not what we need yet.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Violette and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:07, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I just want to reassure you that there is no deadline for working on this draft except one that you set for yourself. Please relax into the task and enjoy making the improvements needed. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes, thank you, Tim. I am working at my own pace, a little bit here and a little bit there. Bruce Bfposner2 (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Bfposner2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:07, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Andrew Violette

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Bfposner2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrew Violette, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic