Your submission at Articles for creation: P.Priime (December 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 00:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Aolaotan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 00:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: P.Priime (December 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SK2242 (talk) 13:32, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: P.Priime (December 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 08:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2021

edit
 

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to P. Prime, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Aolaotan, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aolaotan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Spiderone 10:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Iam not getting paid to create this article on P.Priime. The subject is a close family friend and I am doing it on behalf of his manager. Aolaotan (talk) 11:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

P.Priime moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, P.Priime, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 12:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:P.Priime (1) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:P.Priime (1). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:P.Priime (1) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:P.Priime (1). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: P.Priime (January 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:P.Priime

edit
 

Hello, Aolaotan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "P.Priime".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about P.Priime

edit

Hello,Aolaotan, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Makeitbro, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, P.Priime, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.Priime.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Makeitbro}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Makeitbro (talk) 12:19, 6 November 2022 (UTC)Reply