AnnaABrown
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 8)
editPlease read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:AnnaABrown/sandbox.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: International Test Commission (July 14)
editPlease read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:International Test Commission.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
contributions to Wikipedia!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! AnnaABrown,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
edit
|
Decline
editTo head off any questions, I'd like to explain that I declined your submission because it lacks sources that are independent of the subject and does not appear to be notable. Wikipedia cannot take the word of a subject for referencing about same and outside sources are needed to prove the subject is notable. My oversimplified rule of thumb is: if it wasn't discussed in The New York Times, it's not notable. Please read our specific criteria to understand the bar this draft has to pass. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)