Andreas81

Roxette discography

I didn't do anything with the single list and i fixed most of the problems the list had and why have you deleted the source for the canadian chart positions why? and certifications are not supposed to be like this BPI certification: 2x Platinum but UK: see Nine Inch Nails discography, thats how its supposed to be and yes i deleted the sales number but thats because it doesn't have sources for it. Think find sources okay and im reverting your edits, thats now how a discography is supposed to be. If your against this send me a message on my talk page. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 17:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes but its a rule. First the country they come from, and then the other countries in alphabetical order or if the band is from english speaking first the country they came from and the english countries in alphabetical order and the other countries in alphabetical order. And i didn't edit the singles chart positions but i can fix it if for you. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

I reverted your edits on the Roxette discography, why they where not constructive, see Soundgarden discography, Pink Floyd discography or Queens of the Stone Age discography to see how a discography should look. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Even if you don't like the layout or the look of the Roxette discography all the information given there are correct and shown in a clear way so you can get the information you are search for right away. To every single information there is a source given. So it is all reliable. Please don't convert this site again. Not every discography have to look the same!!!! Andreas81 (talk) 13:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Well to become a Featured List it does and please take a look at how good discographies look likes and not your personal opinion. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 14:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Then unfeature it. I was the one who create it and it took quite some time.

Andreas81 (talk) 17:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Who cears if you created it, you don't controll the page and you don't have the power to make the page worse then what it is. If you continoue i'll report you to an admisitrator who will block you. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 17:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay.... report me to an administrator if you like. It's not worth it to spend time here if it destroyd afterwards. Held in mind that everything is correct what I wrote. You just don't like the style. So please report!

Andreas81 (talk) 19:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Sources for the some of the Certifications are missing, either find a source for it or remove it. What does Europe (band) have to do with Swedish pop. They should be mentioned on the Swedish rock article shouldn't it. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 12:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll give some source for the missing Certifications in the following days. Pop music in general stands for POPular music. But not to get in a fight again I had removed the article to Swedish music abroad to also include this band.

You can mention Europe (band) in the Swedish Rock article. That's where they belong. You can stretch the meaning of 'Pop music' a lot. The same you can with 'Rock music'. Even you added ABBA in the swedish rock article as a soft rock band. Are they a rock band? I don't care if you write this. Andreas81 (talk) 12:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Roxette discography

Your recent edits have been reverted due to failing to support the sales figures with third party reliable sources. Repeated alterations of similar nature without discussions will constitute vandalism to the article and will be treated as such. Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 22:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Roxette discography. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 03:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Your newly added sources to Roxette's Discography

Andreas, it's important to me that you understand that I am simply trying to keep the sales-figures as logically close to artists' actual sales by supporting them with reliable sources, you should not take it personally. I took a look at your new sources, and at least one of them (the German MTV ref.) is a reliable one. However, we could also keep the one from the Swisscharts site. This here doesn't look bad either except that the sales figures are not within the article, so let's exclude that for now. As for other artists' discography pages that you mention in my talk page, I added a reference to Madonna albums discography yesterday. Celine Dion's sales-figure at Celine Dion albums discography is supported by Sony/BMG (major record company sites are acceptable), Katy Perry's discography needs some more citations but I have to admit there aren't that many sales-figures unsourced, I think I could help that page with providing the Certification-Awards for various countries. And everything's looking good with Robbie Williams discography as I managed to provide sources for some and removed the unreferenced figures/certifications Thanks again for understanding.--Harout72 (talk) 17:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of best-selling album artists

I have nominated List of best-selling album artists, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of best-selling album artists. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mattg82 (talk) 19:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Icona Pop discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital Download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Icona Pop discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Just Another Night (Icona Pop song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Just Another Night (Icona Pop song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Another Night (Icona Pop song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 23:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nonono (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nonono (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 07:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Just Another Night.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Just Another Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Just Another Night 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Just Another Night 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Never Been In Love (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andreas81. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andreas81. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andreas81. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andreas81. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Emergency (Icona Pop song" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Emergency (Icona Pop song has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § Emergency (Icona Pop song until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)