User talk:Allen2/ArchiveB 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Allen2. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive block 11/3/2014-11/26/2014
|
---|
November 2014 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for CIR concerns and or trolling. I've noticed a lot of bizarre behavior. Today, you requested protection for the user pages of Dougweller and myself. My user page hasn't seen vandalism in over 7 months. You requested a bot account with admin and crat privleges (see talk archives [1]) and have asked to be a Teahouse host more than once. Your constant speaking about becoming an admin and bureaucrat (and other advanced bits) is beyond obsessive. I can't tell if you are trolling us, or if you just lack the competancy to edit here, but you are a drain on time and resources and these activities dominate your time here.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis - 2¢ 02:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
@DMacks and Dennis Brown: I don't want to waste other editors' time. My evidence is, when do I get unblocked to build an encyclopedia to accept this unblock request? And, I want to edit again that WP:CIR is often necessary for me to follow that. When I'm blocked, I don't want to sock-puppet another account which is what I hated. I must stop wasting other users' time and other admins too. I want to recognize this problem is. So tomorrow, when I start fresh of I wish to build an encyclopedia, I don't have to be an admin or bureaucrat for the next time? I don't mean no disrespect to them, so please try to accept my unblock request tomorrow (not decline). I contribute to Wikipedia is I edit on articles contains a good source of it, and to be honest why it's unfair to be blocked. --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 03:17, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
@Technical 13: Why for a few years I'll be unblocked on Wikipedia, but my block is not necessary here? I know English already and it's my first language and been native. So at this time, I watch My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic in the future right now. --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 12:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Admins, don't take this offensive at all. If you want me to edit through the encyclopedia once again, I use good contributions here and make it a good way to edit some other film articles (etc., My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic). Otherwise, I will delete my global SUL account if you don't remove my block here in 1 year. --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 05:50, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Notice@Lucas Thoms and Technical 13: You know why I were blocked on the English Wikipedia infinitely? I'm still a great editor here that is helping the source on articles. But right now, why do I have to take time away from this site? But I have to be watching on YouTube and Dailymotion sites right now to watch on the show of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. The other sites I was at DeviantArt and FIMFiction, I see My Little Pony fans there (etc.: dogman15, ImperfectXIII, Jonny Manz, shadowdemon137). Now Lucas and Technical 13, I email it to you both for private conversation and chit chat. --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 01:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Editing your talk pageDo not modify my text, contained within the block template. Those are my exact words, use precisely to explain to any reviewing administrator what the block is for. Editors are not allowed to change the meaning of another editor's text, and certainly not in this instance. Do not remove previous unblock templates. While there is debate about the necessity of keeping them on the talk page, in this case they were a part of an editing session where you changed my words as well. Keeping the templates on your page is an act of honesty and makes it easier for any admin to review your unblock in the future. If are misuse your talk page, access to it can and will be removed. Dennis - 2¢ 01:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
I'm a good editor here, but I hated to be blocked on this site. I will make another unblock request for admins later if you wish to approve that unblock then delete all of my block log entries from here. Can you be honest about what I edit to them is add a valid source there? --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 02:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Email response@NQ: I have mail for you of your private response. --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 00:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC) Block evasionAllen, you have been told multiple times in the past that you cannot use your IP address to pretend to be someone else. This is especially true when you're blocked. Blocks apply to the person, not the account. Stop editing with your IP. You're not anonymous; that IP geolocates to Houston and its writing sounds exactly like yours...this is along with the fact that it most recently edited a page in your userspace.—LucasThoms 01:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Using another accountI want to use another account on Wikipedia, or I can't do that right now? --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 04:52, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Good effort conversationI must apologize, but I don't know if you can convince that you understand my English was going to get me unblocked? I've also got a block for reckless lack of judge editing. I might contribute to English Wikipedia more often and start editing to the My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic article again. Also I mentioned these users who come from MLP Wikia and edit more often: 343 TheGuiltyProphet, dogman15, ImperfectXIII, Foodbandlt, Jonny Manz, Rallinale, Reaper Eternal, and TyA. I will make another unblock request if k6, Lucas Thoms and Technical 13 agrees with this comment or not. After you did removed my block, delete all of my block log entries from here then I'll be fine (I didn't like The Mol Man to look at my block log like that). I'll give you another award/barnstar if you make a good effort of unblocking me. Brohoof! --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 23:17, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Talk page access revokedCIR concerns was noted in the block log as the primary reason for the block. I have left the talk page open until now to provide an avenue to communicate and disprove that initial finding but everything said since has only served to reinforce the original assessment. I agree with Technical 13 that the proper avenue for Allen 2 to seek an unblock would be either WP:UTRS or WP:BASC. You have every right to use those avenues to seek an unblock. If I may set aside my admin bit for a second, and just talk to Allen, man to man, I would simply say this: Allen, you seem like a nice fellow, you truly do. If we met on the bus, I'm sure you would be a delight to talk to. I'm sure you would make a fine neighbor as well. But I have to be honest and say that I'm confident that editing at Wikipedia isn't the right hobby for you. I believe you don't mean to cause problems, but you are a bit disruptive here. I'm sure there is another website out there where you probably will fit right in, and have a good time, but I'm just as sure that if I unblocked you, it would become a series of problems and blocks here at Wikipedia, and that isn't fun for anyone. I appreciate and respect your desire to edit here, but I think you will be happier elsewhere. I'm sorry, but out of respect for you, I feel I need to be honest and tell you this instead of just avoiding the issue. Whatever you do, where you go, I hope you find peace, friend. Dennis - 2¢ 00:22, 21 November 2014 (UTC) Editing under IPAllen2 has edited using User:76.31.88.143. -- GB fan 19:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Archive block 12/27/2015-1/8/2017
|
---|
Unblock requestThank you for your email. I do not handle unblock requests by email. Unblocking you will need to be a decision taken by several administrators. Please follow the instructions you were given and make your request to WP:UTRS. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:43, 27 December 2015 (UTC) Appeal 12/29/2015
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Allen2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: After a year ago I was blocked for lack of competency, I just read and convince that WP:CIR is a good faith to me for competence on Wikipedia. I believe this block is no longer necessary anymore after a long period I did spend from editing on this site, and I believe Wikipedia is an encyclopedia site not a social networking site. So I'll let you consider unblocking me for another chance at this time as I'm ready to contribute once again on Wikipedia and improve the encyclopedia. Thank you, --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 20:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC) Decline reason: Sorry, but phrases like "I just read and convince that WP:CIR is a good faith to me for competence on Wikipedia" does not convince me that you are competent in English, let alone editing Wikipedia. Have you tried your own language Wikipedia? Also it still appears from your answer below that you are merely here to try to get admin and oversight rights. Optimist on the run (talk) 15:22, 30 December 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Appeal 12/31/2015
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Allen2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I can confirm that this block is no longer necessary anymore after I followed this I did spend 6 months from editing at this site well 12 months of course. My and their edit revisions and my log entries, I decided to keep them there however not going to hide/remove them, even that I said I don't have to be an admin nor an oversighter here. So I believe that I'll contribute to Wikipedia again and improve the encyclopedia when you give me another chance of unblocking me at this time. Also, I want to be unblocked within this year too. Thanks, --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 17:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC) Decline reason: I have read through this entire page. Twice. you claim repeatedly that English is your first language; I have no data except your statement, so must accept it as true. But your continual errors in usage and syntax, which have persisted for the duration of this thread, certainly show a lack of competence in the usage of your claimed native tongue. Whether this incompetence is of itself enough to keep you blocked may be seen as arguable, but in my view your apparent obsession with "magic", which is a null concept in Wikipedia, your obvious obsession with My Little Pony, which is irrelevant to Wikipedia (other than via the article already extant), your inability to understand the functions of admins and oversighters, both of which are clearly described in the relevant pages, and your self-admitted lack of comprehension as to what a block here actually means, render you in my opinion unsafe to unblock. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
2016 just began already, so I will not do anything bad as this year will be great and the luckiest for me and everyone else. I believe it's fair for me to be unblocked at this time because I'm ready to edit/contribute on the English Wikipedia again to expand the source of the article, build and improve the encyclopedia. Trust me that I want to be unblocked. Just keep me unblocked here as I said, and well sometimes you'll be able to help me on Wikipedia not to make me feel bad. --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 21:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Admin reminder 1/7/2016It's unfair for me to be blocked on Wikipedia. Well admins can you please trust and believe me that I want to be unblocked at this time? I'm going to make another unblock request however I want it accepted. After I'm successfully unblocked, then I'll re-create my user page and my short sandbox, well sometimes I'm here on Wikipedia to help and improve on the encyclopedia. I said this before, I didn't need admin and oversight rights on Wikipedia at this time until I wish to in the future within a couple of years or so, also as I'm worried about my revision history I don't need to hide/RevDel them as I don't want to talk about it in the past and you too. --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 05:30, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
|
Archive block 1/8/2017-5/19/2018
|
---|
Appeal 1/8/2017I'll try this again.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Allen2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I'm sorry why I'm blocked on Wikipedia in the first place because of my poor competence (and my lack of ability to edit in an encyclopedia setting). So "I know what Wikipedia is!" (after my break): Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not the place for other things. I have to say this that English is my first language, Vietnamese is my second language, and Russian is my third language. I tried the Simple English Wikipedia and corrected my grammar in a coherent way when I come back the latest. I'm sorry that my English was nonsensical when I contribute here in a few years ago. I must say this: I don't need to have oversight and admin rights on Wikipedia because I choose not to have those rights, I do is I'm a regular user (with autoconfirmed and extendedconfirmed status). Decline reason: Declining per continued competency concerns. If you'd like me to post an appeal to a wider community venue (WP:AN), I will, but I'm not comfortable unblocking with such recent edits on the simple wiki demonstrating poor English being introduced into the mainspace. ~ Rob13Talk 20:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I'm waiting to hear a word from an admin to review this request and then unblock me. Oh, and one more thing, can you delete my talk page editnotice page for me (however after I'm unblocked then I'll do it myself with a delete template there)? Because I don't need that editnotice page in this page until I re-create that page without that blue box and with my improved English. --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 01:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
I was looking over the requests for unblock, and I recognized this one—I vaguely remember hearing about this case a couple of years ago. I see that there has been much back-and-forth over Allen's ability to effectively communicate and edit, but that really won't get us anywhere. Why not use the second chance procedure and let Allen show us if he can contribute productively? Biblio (talk) 23:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Appeal 1/31/2017Let's try this again. I won't regret of making another unblock request.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Allen2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: The good reason I want to be unblocked is: I "want" to modify my own pages (and contribute occasionally with a substantial edit to the encyclopedic article or page I want to edit). I'm "sorry" about why I'm blocked on Wikipedia in the first place because of my lack of competence, so I'll "try" to be competent about what Wikipedia is: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not the place for other things such as this is a social network. Also, you "have to" be comfortable of unblocking me when I'm ready to come back with an opportunity of having "another chance" to edit and contribute often. So can you unblock me, please? I "promise" you this that I "wish" to be unblocked (by giving me "another chance") as I said above on this appeal text, so I can modify my own pages (I "can't" edit my own pages while I'm blocked). Because (I would think that) I'm "ready" to edit and contribute (productively) onto this site again after my break. And also, with my English and grammar, it is yet to be 100% proficient by fixing some of my minor errors in my grammar. Decline reason: I have the same concerns about competency as BU Rob13 from the last decline. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As recently as December 2016 Allen2 tried to get their username changed to "Allen-alt3", which was declined. Their rationale was
SituationI made contributions onto the Simple English Wikipedia with a few article edits there (see my latest contributions), so maybe I have an "option" to state my edits to the encyclopedic articles here on this wiki after I'm unblocked which means that may resolve my competency issues and problems here. Talk page access and Wikipedia email access withdrawnThis has gone on long enough. Admin shopping not get your appeals addressed. If you wish to appeal again you will need to use WP:UTRS but please remember that our admins also operate that system. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:
Allen2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) UTRS appeal #17817 was submitted on Mar 19, 2017 00:36:54. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 00:36, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:
Allen2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) UTRS appeal #19085 was submitted on Aug 26, 2017 18:33:23. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 18:33, 26 August 2017 (UTC) Talk page access restored - standard offer appealI have restored access to your talk page for the sole purpose of responding to questions on your SO appeal that will be posted shortly. Any other usage of this talk page will result in your access being revoked again. Just Chilling (talk) 20:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:
Allen2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) UTRS appeal #21144 was submitted on Apr 08, 2018 22:55:09. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 22:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
|