Notability of Aviva Farber

edit

A tag has been placed on Aviva Farber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 00:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Redirects

edit

You are screwing up redirects. You have redirected several pages to the disambiguation page for Hairspray, not the film. Please fix. Otherwise I'll revert. Ward3001 20:19, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Kirby Bliss Blanton

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Kirby Bliss Blanton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. NrDg 20:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

September 2007

edit
 

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Camilla and Rebecca Rosso. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Cant use role image as image for actor under fair use rules. Can only be used to illustrate the role as part of the commentary for the role. NrDg 20:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Brandon Osborne

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Brandon Osborne, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.  superβεεcat  01:35, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Jordan Puryear

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Jordan Puryear, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. NrDg 13:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to List of Cory in the House characters, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. NrDg 13:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Page-move vandalism

edit

Please do not move pages to nonsense titles, as you did with Roxy (Hannah Montana). This is considered vandalism, and you will be blocked if you continue in such a fashion. bibliomaniac15 01:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


October 2007

edit
 

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 01:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Helen Slayton-Hughes

edit

An IP who claims to be Helen Slayton-Hughes removed the very information you recently added to that article. She says that somebody may be confusing her with Helen S. Hughes. Please read Talk:Helen Slayton-Hughes and also see the IP's edits: [1]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbowers3 (talkcontribs) 22:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Kia Kee, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=12&article_id=6073. As a copyright violation, Kia Kee appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Kia Kee has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Kia Kee and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Kia Kee with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Kia Kee.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 23:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maisha

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Maisha, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Maisha. Fabrictramp (talk) 21:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Sabrina Aldridge

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Sabrina Aldridge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jfire (talk) 04:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dia Bromwellih - proposed deletion

edit

Author(s) notification template: ==Proposed deletion of Dia Bromwellih==

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dia Bromwellih, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mrhsj (talk) 18:01, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Matilda's family

edit

I re-edited your redirected pages. Please d onot rediect them or I may request a block.

Negabandit86 (talk) 21:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ferguson Frye

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ferguson Frye, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ENTERTAINER; not even listed at IMDB (link in article goes to someone else).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jfire (talk) 01:28, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kristian De La Osa for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristian De La Osa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristian De La Osa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Skr15081997 (talk) 11:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Dikembe the Ambassador" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Dikembe the Ambassador has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 7 § Dikembe the Ambassador until a consensus is reached. BD2412 T 03:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Lynn Thomas (That's So Raven)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Lynn Thomas (That's So Raven) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § Lynn Thomas (That's So Raven) until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply