Ajarrett20
Derby rankings edit
FYI - the Final Ranking in those tables refers to the end of year ranking that comes out in January, which is dated December 31, such as [1], not June. As such there is no 2019 Final Ranking as of yet, so please don't add any at this time. If you are adding missing 2018 Final Rankings kindly do, but ensure you use the ranking dated Dec 31, 2018, as published by WFTDA on January 7 of this year. Echoedmyron (talk) 18:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Home Service Club edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Home Service Club, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 16:47, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of 97th Floor for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 97th Floor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/97th Floor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 16:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
I believe this article is up for deletion because my most recent edits were questionable. I did not mean for that to happen, and I apologize for not producing the right standard of edits to the wikipedia community. As I believe this article is up for deletion because of me, not because of the content there. I did not mean for that to happen and I truly do believe that this article does provide value as 97th Floor was a company discussed on other pages (ROWE) and so in my opinion it does provide value to have more information. I will be more careful about future publications as to not run into this issue again. Ajarrett20 (talk) 16:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
paid editing edit
Hello Ajarrett20. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ajarrett20. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ajarrett20|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 16:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi there! I am sorry my recent edits came across as promotional, that was not my intention. I hadn't contributed to the wikipedia community for a little bit, so I thought the creation of a new page would help me remember the process. As I thought of pages I could contribute and then created that page. Once again, it was not my intention to be promotional, and if my recent edits appear that way, please feel free to remove them. I will be more careful in the future if I am allowed to edit still.
Ajarrett20 (talk) 16:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:97th Floor Logo.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:97th Floor Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 19 December 2019 (UTC)