Welcome!

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Adam Arabiya! Thank you for your contributions. I am I dream of horses and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Commander: The Great War) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Commander: The Great War, Adam Arabiya!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'm moving this to Draft: Commander: The Great War

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Abderrahmane Dahane) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Abderrahmane Dahane, Adam Arabiya!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'm moving this to Draft:Abderrahmane Dahane.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

March 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Orphan Wiki. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Love Jihad— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Orphan Wiki 12:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Love Jihad. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Love Jihad was changed by Adam Arabiya (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956669 on 2016-03-06T12:45:17+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:45, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Subject

edit

Sorry guys if I made anything un constructive I don't believe there is sufficient evidence to support the concept of Love jihad Adam Arabiya (talk) 12:49, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

But that's what the article says, more or less. "Alleged", "conspiracy theory". It does look as though you were editing it logged out earlier. Doug Weller talk 14:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

In that case the heading should be changed the term "love jihad" sounds quite Instructive and and could mislead people into believing it's a credible and founded practice when in fact, we have no trusted data to support this. Contributions I hope to make toward this page in future will be dependant on the evidence we have to work with not the alleged reports given by "Indian" authorities.

The concept is also very selective ,India and Asia according to the data presented on thee antique map and reports shown, this would support my argument to specify and cancel out the broader term offered "love jihad" Adam Arabiya (talk) 14:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Allah Akbar (disambiguation)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Allah Akbar (disambiguation). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Allah Akbar. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Allah Akbar – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. - MrX 14:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

ARBIPA sanctions alert

edit
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 15:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Abderrahmane Dahane

edit
 

Hello, Adam Arabiya. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Abderrahmane Dahane".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 00:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply