Abigailwise, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Abigailwise! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clare Marie Hodges has been accepted edit

 
Clare Marie Hodges, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blair Braverman (March 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donna Carpenter (March 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 22:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Donna Carpenter has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Donna Carpenter. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 20:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Donna Carpenter has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Donna Carpenter. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rose Marcario (April 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 23:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donna Carpenter (April 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 05:44, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blair Braverman (May 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gtstricky was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GtstrickyTalk or C 17:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Don't give up! edit

In the light of all the above refusals, you might be tempted to stop creating articles on Wikipedia. I hope you don't as you are obviously a talented writer and have gone to some trouble to provide secondary sources in your articles. I have drawn attention to the difficulties you and your colleagues are facing on the Women in Red talk page. If ever you need any assistance, please let me know.--Ipigott (talk) 11:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

100% in agreement with Ian. The #1 issue I found with the two articles I took to mainspace, Blair Braverman and Junko Kazukawa was the lede. It should state specifically why the subject is "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention". I will be happy to help as well, if you let me know. WiR members are usually very responsive and if you need help and post there, typically many eyes will see your request. SusunW (talk) 00:01, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ann Krcik has been accepted edit

 
Ann Krcik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 15:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Donna Carpenter edit

 

Hello, Abigailwise. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Donna Carpenter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 17:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)Reply