Ab.Haris999

Hi, This is my talk page, Feel free to leave a message--Ab.Haris999 (talk) 00:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

John Kiramis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, John Kiramis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your message I am new here actually all the information I mentioned in the John Kiramis Page is referred from the links I cite in the page and some some I take from Amazon Central page so can u help me to specify the info I have to change or can I referred amazon central page? I thought mentioning amazon is kind of promotional act so can you guide me how to deal with it, it will be helpful. Thank you Ab.Haris999 (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kiramis (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Kiramis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 13:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Ab.Haris999! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca talk to me! 13:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kiramis (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Kiramis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 10:57, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

HI @Ca Thank you for your response on my last request and I am so sorry I mistakenly cite the search page of California Digital Newspaper Collection instead of actual article page so sorry I fixed that cite can you please check that citation and also I remove the unnecessary details, with California Digital Newspaper Collection article is this draft eligible to publish Thank you Ab.Haris999 (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I can look at it when I have time. Cheers, Ca ^{talk to me!} 02:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much please i humbly request when you get time please review it and please approve this page I am still working to improve and also i work on this after publishing but i will give me motivation to work hard on this i will be great help thank you once again 202.47.51.131 (talk) 02:43, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Ca it's been more then a week when i request you to recheck my work please can you look at it actually i want to tell you that all the details are same as before last review i just do 2 changes 1 was the citation of (California Digital Newspaper Collections) and the other one i remove the last sentence of career section so it didn't take time for the full detail review because it's same with 2 changes i hope you understand or please tell me before you review it depends on his Article in (California Digital Newspaper Collections)is he eligible to be a published please i am very nervous for this it will be great help for me if you guide me or if you accept john kiramis page for publishing this will be my great achievement please reply me before you review it and if you see everything is good in article please please publish it or reply me sir have a good day thank you. 202.47.51.131 (talk) 02:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kiramis (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Kiramis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 16:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the reply I was hopping this time it will published but you didn't, You mentioned keyword ("paid for") i checked the article the paid for keyword only used for committee not for the article here is the context Paid for by Committee to Elect John Kiramis City Council 2012 although article written by Thomas Jefferson not any paid article John Kiramis Profile is Ex Mayor he is polition isn't he notable and the articles in California Digital Newspaper Collection San Mateo Daily Journal, East Bay TImes proves it isn't this all Enough? to publish this page Ab.Haris999 (talk) 20:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

HI @Ca hey I found some new sources for this page and also I have a pam.wikipedia page on Foster city california that show John Kiramis as mayor and 3 to 4 new sources can you please tell is it enough can i use pam wikipedia page as citation in english wikipedia

Foster City, California - Wikipedia

Clearwisdom Weekly (minghui.org) Ab.Haris999 (talk) 23:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Ca I hope you are doing well I know you said you will not review again John Kiramis but I am requesting you not review that page just check the references and external links please can you check that reference only check not review full page if you think that references and external links are good enough to publish that page please just reply me then i will try to contact other wikipedian to review that page please can you just check the references and external please this is humble request. Thank you Ab.Haris999 (talk) 06:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Knee (Gamer) (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Knee (Gamer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Johannes Maximilian thank you for the review i improve this page can you please recheck this page.

Thank you Ab.Haris999 (talk) 22:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Knee (Gamer) (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Knee (Gamer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 08:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

HI @Fade258 i just added more sources in Knee draft can you please recheck that page before i resubmit it? Ab.Haris999 (talk) 22:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 22:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ab.Haris999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello i am new on Wikipedia i am learning to edit that's why i edit so much to find new tools and option from now i will edit by reading guidelines first then i will edit i mostly edit my drafts and sandbox so please unblock me Thank you. Ab.Haris999 (talk) 20:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the reasons for the block at all. 331dot (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ab.Haris999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi now i know why i am blocked from editing i used same internet after getting warnings same IP which is host service i know i made a mistake i am so sorry for that i am now so i don't know about that so please can i give me one more chance to do things rightly i will not go against guidelines Thank you. Ab.Haris999 (talk) 22:53, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No, this is not why you are blocked. Yamla (talk) 23:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ab.Haris999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello i hope you are doing well i requested before for one chance now know i get banned because of (Wikipedia policy on undisclosed paid advocacy) i saw the history of my banned query i don't know where i did this i recently work on Draft:Knee(Gamer) I add more sources in his page and ask the reviewer to check the draft before i resubmit draft page but he didn't reply then next day i got notification of my banned i think it's because administrator thought I am getting paid for creating knee page he is professional gamer i don't know him personally i just saw him play tekken on youtube that's what triggered me to work on his page that's all he is from other country other region and i am from other how i am getting paid by him or if i am getting paid you can check my profile i am new user on wikipedia i did't create one single page who get published before this i work on a John Kiramis page he is also from other region and that page gets rejected 3 times so why someone hire a learner boy to create page and i try to learn because in my country so many politicians and other celebrities don't have any page but they are notable i think i try to create other celebs or politicians page as practice because i think if i create my country celebs page so it will be fishy for wikipedia so i am jut trying to learn to create page and found the reliable sources please expect my review and unblocked me i didn't do anything wrong all the sources i add in every draft you can verify them. Please unblocked me give me a chance with an warning Thank You. Ab.Haris999 (talk) 23:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. You should address this reason in your next unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ab.Haris999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I hope you are doing well and thank you for mention the reason why i am blocked but i didn't use any other account i have only one account on wikipedia you can check my contributions and my drafts all the edit i made all with this current account i remember i reply someone with my mobile and i didn't remember i was logged in or not but i didn't use any other account i don't know what administrator finds with my id or my account but i know i didn't use any other account did you find something with other account used by IP? or did he make any edit? i don't know about it i think administrator is confusing me with someone or i don't know what happened what you found but i can guarantee you i don't have any other account can you please recheck my account and unblock me i didn't do anything wrong i don't even know what was the reason why i got blocked please unblock me. Thank youAb.Haris999 (talk) 18:38, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. UtherSRG (talk) 14:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ab.Haris999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi i hope you are doing well it's been 6 days i request for review my last request please can you review my last request again and review my account my contributes again i already said i never get paid for wiki i never succeed to create any page my two pages are in drafts so how i get banned on this reason please review my request and unblock me Thank you Ab.Haris999 (talk) 20:38, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There's already a request open above. Admins patrolling this category are volunteers, and may take some time to get to your request. SQL^{Query Me!} 15:49, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kiramis (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Kiramis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish)} 15:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC)