November 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Scots Guards, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 12:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scots Guards. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 10:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Jacona. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Lady A—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jacona (talk) 15:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Apollo program. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Scots Guards, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Scots Guards. Kathleen's bike (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Scots Guards. Dormskirk (talk) 15:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.