85.92.183.167

October 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Rob Haworth seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:46, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to St Albans City F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tourettism, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Tourettism was changed by 85.92.183.167 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862785 on 2017-10-13T09:52:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paki (slur).
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Paki (slur) was changed by 85.92.183.167 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.982309 on 2017-10-13T09:54:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Gilliam (talk) 09:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to William Blake has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: William Blake was changed by 85.92.183.167 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936972 on 2017-12-06T10:31:39+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:54, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Walton-on-the-Naze. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Bruce1ee^talk 12:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

09:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Oshwah (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Acroterion (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Edward Jenner. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 14:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Autocorrection— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 14:53, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Autocorrection. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Autocorrection was changed by 85.92.183.167 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950446 on 2018-12-06T15:02:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ann Williams has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ann Williams was changed by 85.92.183.167 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858613 on 2019-03-25T11:50:59+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ann Williams. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Skeptical Ham (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ann Williams, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 12:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ann Williams. The Skeptical Ham (talk) 12:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Diogenes—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:44, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anamorphosis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:44, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lean manufacturing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Beastranger (talk) 11:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lean manufacturing, you may be blocked from editing. Beastranger (talk) 12:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Birmingham Ladywood (UK Parliament constituency). Mattythewhite (talk) 14:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Several cases of vandalizing here as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Silenus&action=history /Urbourbo (talk) 13:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Marlborough Science Academy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

---