81.100.25.101

Sourcing

Make sure that you are sourcing what you add to Wikipedia articles, per WP:Verifiability and WP:Reliable sources. And do not add text beside a reference, as though the reference supports the text, unless you know that the reference supports the text. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Regarding this edit, I hope that you are sticking to what the source states and are not faking a source there or elsewhere on this site. If I come across that source and it doesn't support what you are adding to articles, I will yank your material and report you at WP:ANI. Also, when sources report differently, we include what both sources state, unless one report is more accepted in the literature; see WP:Neutral, and the WP:Due weight part of it. That is partly why I made this edit; the other reason is because you seem to have added unsourced material. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

"Fuller, 1864" is also obviously a very old source. If what you are adding is correct, then it should be easy to find such material supported in more recent WP:Reliable sources. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:51, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

I still don't trust your editing, and will eventually look into the matter. Also, if you are Meganesia, you should be editing while signed in. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi there and thanks for your interest in Neanderthals. Please don't change something without changing the sources, it's misleading. Nicolas Perrault (talk) 16:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, I'm Dewritech. I noticed that you recently removed some content from East Syrian Rite without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dewritech (talk) 08:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016

Hello, I'm Baking Soda. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Genocides in history, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hello, your recent additions are improperly referenced and will be reverted. Please check out other referenced parts of the page, inquire on article talk page, or WP:Help Desk. Baking Soda (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Assyria, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 15:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more articles into Assyria. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 03:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Syrian Civil War. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Amccann421 (talk) 17:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Persecution of Christians WP:OR and missing summary line

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Iñaki LL (talk) 08:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Assyrian continuity, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Assyrian cont

I understand your point about the lead and I think your view is very fair on such as sensitive topic. Assyrian continuity used to be far more prominent in scholarship but since then we've rejected primordialist nationalism and increasingly use critical modernist theories of nationalism, and the fact is that assyriologists now mostly do not support continuity, certainly not in the way phrased in the lead. Some Assyrian as well as Aramean and Persian descent is to be expected considering the history of the region, but so the anthropological thinking goes, it was impossible for them to continue to distinguish themselves from Chaldeans/Arameans after losing their language, names, and other identifying characteritics. I'm not "anti-assyrian" as you may accuse, (at least not anti-modern assyrian, the ancient assyrians were assholes, albeit talented ones) what bothers me is the deligitimization of chaldean/aramean voices. Christian Aramaic speakers in Hasaka Syria are called assyria when they don't identify as such, and its actually very unlikely they are assyrian considering west of the euphrates was aramean during the neo-assyrian period. I also hate the misuse of the syrian/assyrian confusion. --Monochrome_Monitor 08:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

I would like to add a comment here. You may not be anti-Assyrian, but you been on a witch-hunt for a while now. I understand that one might get tired, but you should not let that tranfer into hatred in any way. I think that what you wrote about shows that you do lack a lot of knowledge in some areas and this is a trigger in this hunt; I'm assuming that you are refering to Eastern Aramaic-speakers of Syria. Most of them arrived there after Seyfo, while originating from Tur Abdin-areas. And the claim that none would identify themselves as Assyrian is not correct either. Which Aramean organizations (among these Eastern Aramaic-speakers) exist in Syria? I can't name one, when there are some Assyrian (and them I'm not including the ones among the Assyrian of Nestorian faith in around the Khabour river). The "Aramean ideology" in its modern form was created in Europe in the 70's as a reaction to the Assyrian, mostly by persons affiliatd with the Syriac Orthodox Church, which saw itself losing control of its members due to the secural Assyrian movement. Mor Julius Hanna Aydin, the archbishop in Germany, who is considered to the one first leader among the Arameans in Germany, spoke about this in an interview not to long ago. I could find it if it would be in your interest. You do not seems to be a fan of Parpola, but his writings about the identity in the Neo-Assyrian empire is quite interesting, and that might give you some insight aroud the whole "it was then impossible to distingush then from Arameans/Chaldeans" thing. Now, regarding Assyrian continuty, I think that this comment is worth reading. Have a nice day. Shmayo (talk) 14:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Actually many Assyrian Christians of Hassakeh DO identify as Assyrians, most of them in fact. Ahh, so you are an Arameanist, which explains your attacks.

Edit warring on Assyrian continuity

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TimothyJosephWood 19:24, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Assyrian flag

Hi. Please make sure it exists before adding it. Thanks. El_C 00:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Languages of the Caucasus seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Home Lander. An edit you recently made to Christianity in the Middle East seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Your addition to DNA history of Egypt has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. CityOfSilver 23:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to DNA history of Egypt does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! CityOfSilver 23:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to Phoenicia

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! TushiTalk To Me 08:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Archaeogenetics of the Near East‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 03:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 20:59, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Syrianska FC, you may be blocked from editing. WikiAviator (talk) 12:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I did not really consider entering the football club was founded by Assyriacs/Syriacs in Sweden vandalism or particularly disruptive. After all the term Syriac derives from Assyrian, which is consensus modern academic opinion, and the people are historically the same.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Assyria. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (81.100.25.101) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alex Bakharev (talk) 12:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

81.100.25.101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have mainly been editing the Assyria page, which was in need of updating, and hopefully I did a good job. I referenced my edits, they were not challenged or criticized by anyone, I was not accused of Edit Warring or Vandalizm, and thus I would respectfully ask my block is removed. I cannot myself see that I have done anything wrong?

Accept reason:

As I cannot see any vandalism from this IP in the past week, and since the block has been queried by two other established administrators, I will conclude this is a clerical error and have unblocked. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:51, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

• Alex Bakharev I think I know, but could you please clarify the reason for the block? Thanks 331dot (talk) 15:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
• I could not see it.   Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this IP address or network has been used to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse.
If you are not the intended target of this block, please read the information below in order to receive assistance.

Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.

IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. To request an account, simply click here and follow the directions provided on the page. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. When filling out the account request form, please refer to this block in the "comments" input field. If you've been instructed to request an account via email, please refer to this block in your message.

Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in, you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

 — Berean Hunter (talk) 00:13, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

• You will need to log into your last account to request an unblock.
   — Berean Hunter (talk) 00:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

I've requested an account as per the instructions above, think i've done it correctly. Dont have any other account, but brought this place from brother in law and his family last year, any issues attatched to this IP from them are not via me. I used to live in Runcorn, northern England and occasionally edit from there, but I didn't need an account then?

I have not been involved in any kind of vandalism, edit wars, arguing or posting anything unreferenced since I started editing, not had any warnings etc. So hopefully I can have an account, and i'd only edit in the same way I am already, hopefully intelligent, referenced and constructive stuff.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.100.25.101 (talk) 21:18, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

(re IP) If you bought the house last year, why would the same static IP address be there? You would have had to sign up for service and likely gotten a different one as you would have a different account or even a different ISP.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 16:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Comment. If I may say, that this was in fact a new user (which was why I welcomed them). I don't have access to whatever Berean Hunter sees, though. As a person I welcomed, I only think it fair that I comment to support what they say in as far as being here is concerned. (talk page watcher) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

MJL, new user from when? They are editing Celtic Britons, Indo-European languages, Assyria, Assyrian continuity etc. and other same exact articles back in 2017 (and back to 2015) when I blocked. I don't find it plausible that his "brother-in-law" would be editing exactly the same articles. Please review their contribs going back and notice the continuity of article subjects. This is not a new user. Also see their block log and note that I wasn't yet a checkuser in July 2017 so I could name accounts. There was an admission by an account so I know that I didn't make a mistake then.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 16:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

@Berean Hunter: Yeah, you are completely right. Those behavioral patterns are 1-to-1. I just looked at the SPI, old contributions, their style of edits, the whole thing. Previously this IP was getting in trouble for edit warring and adding unsourced material. The edits I had reviewed were more constructive than that. However, given the context of an editor who has had four years+ to learn (both how to contribute and how to block evade), this makes more sense. My apologies for getting this completely wrong. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

@Berean Hunter: If this IP had a block, it was already removed by 7 July 2019. That being the case, if the block was removed, why was it suddenly reinstated, bearing in mind only good edits, no edit wars or vandalizm. Not totally sure what's occurring here? I've edited since this year, only or mainly on Mid east and Cornish type things, those being family heritage. I try and keep the written style in same type as what's been used before otherwise it looks off, everything referenced, or tbf, most of it. What I did do though was cut-paste some old versions and reword them very slightly, but didnt think that was wrong. I didnt need to change an IP adress as just kept the existing contract. Honestly, if I wanted to evade some block there are ways to change the IP Address, I didnt do that, its not difficult. Well, I dont know what else I can say, I could understand if my edits were bad or wrong or unreferrenced or if I was getting into spats with other people, but none of that is happening. There's zero I can do about being tied to my brother in law and his son who edited via this place. Tried to apply for a specific account, so there is no confusion or doubt = if that account is being unconstructive or disruptive then all know its me, and sure, block me if it comes to it.

August 2019

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.100.25.101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

If this IP had a block, it was already removed by 7 July 2019. That being the case, if the block was removed, why was it suddenly reinstated, bearing in mind only good edits, no edit wars or vandalizm. Not totally sure what's occurring here? I've edited since this year, only or mainly on Mid east and Cornish type things, those being family heritage. I try and keep the written style in same type as what's been used before otherwise it looks off, everything referenced, or tbf, most of it. What I did do though was cut-paste some old versions and reword them very slightly, but didnt think that was wrong. I didnt need to change an IP adress as just kept the existing contract. Honestly, if I wanted to evade some block there are ways to change the IP Address, I didnt do that, its not difficult. Well, I dont know what else I can say, I could understand if my edits were bad or wrong or unreferrenced or if I was getting into spats with other people, but none of that is happening. There's zero I can do about being tied to my brother in law and his son who edited via this place. Tried to apply for a specific account, so there is no confusion or doubt = if that account is being unconstructive or disruptive then all know its me, and sure, block me if it comes to it.

Decline reason:

Per below. Make an appeal while logged-in to your account. If you don't have an account, you can appeal the block via WP:UTRS. However, this appears to be a static IP address used only by one person. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Berean Hunter: You previously were pinged by this IP. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 20:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

I ignored him both then and when I saw this request earlier today. I'm not going to haggle with an IP when I've instructed him to log into his account to request an unblock. TPA revoked.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 20:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

---