October 2017

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Roger Allers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denniss (talk) 11:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2017

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  CactusWriter (talk) 22:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Vampirina—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 03:31, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Vampirina. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sea Cow (talk) 03:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Vampirina—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Vampirina. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:27, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Vampirina, you may be blocked from editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:34, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Vampirina. T@hmid (T@lk) 02:03, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at James Baxter (animator), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 04:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2023

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Vampirina, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. David Brooks (talk) 21:07, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.