Your submission at Articles for creation: Libre Space Foundation (March 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 73.0.115.41! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teknaf Beach has been accepted edit

 
Teknaf Beach, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 01:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jampore Beach (March 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Hatchens was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Hatchens (talk) 01:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Australian Open – Wildcards (March 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iffy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
IffyChat -- 12:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marine Permaculture (March 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix (March 25) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Silikonz. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to User:LivingGreenWay/Brandon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Silikonz (💬 | 🖋) 10:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandon Good (April 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to User:LivingGreenWay/Brandon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate you looking out for us but that is a sandbox article under the user's namespace. 73.0.115.41 (talk) 18:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandon Good (April 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 12:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm AeschyIus. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to User:LivingGreenWay/MarkSetBot—has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. aeschyIus (talk) 18:53, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I am the same person and aware. You just deleted all my work. Thanks.73.0.115.41 (talk) 18:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
If you are the same person, then you are okay. @73.0.115.41 aeschyIus (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline edit

  Hello, 73.0.115.41. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 22:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mercury pollution in Canada has been accepted edit

 
Mercury pollution in Canada, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 21:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandon Good (June 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 16:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply