November 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Indigenous peoples in Brazil— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017

edit

Hi. You need to follow the manual of style much more closely. (Go to any other article to see how their lead is structured.) Because, urrently, your edits constitute vandalism, which you may be blocked from editing for without further warning. Thanks. El_C 08:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Last chance. El_C 09:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 7 World Trade Center. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a home for conspiracy theories - please stop. David J Johnson (talk) 09:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017

edit

  Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. 183.171.182.241 (talk) 07:54, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

August 2017

edit

  Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. 183.171.182.224 (talk) 13:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. 115.164.215.121 (talk) 12:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. 115.164.58.52 (talk) 03:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

February 2018

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. HunterM267 talk 19:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fred Phelps. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —MelbourneStartalk 07:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tammy Abraham, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm DB1729. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sean McDermott have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DB1729 (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars (April 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 69.74.46.146! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Prairie Astronomer. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Bobby Hebert, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Prairie Astronomer Contributions 22:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2023

edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Mauritius sheldgoose. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Dinoz1 (chat?) (he/him) 15:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm The Night Watch. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Superbase—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The Night Watch (talk) 02:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply