50.240.235.141

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (50.240.235.141) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''''The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle''''' is a 2000 American [[live-action]]/[[Animation|Animated [[Adventure film|adventure]] [[comedy film]] produced by [[Universal Studios]]
• ]; Mitchell and Thompson were [[Kenan and Kel|also a famous comedy duo]] in their own right.</ref>) two students at Bullwinkle's old university, [[Wossamotta U]]. Boris and Natasha get there first,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Problem Solverz because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [1] Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [2][3][4][5][6] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:24, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Fox Kids, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: [7] Statements about how "overwhelming" the negative critical response to a series has been, needs to come from a resource that aggregates all critical opinions, like Metacritic or Rotten Tomatoes. To find a dozen negative reviews on your own and decide that they represent overwhelming negative response, is original research, and more specifically, "synthesis". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 99.46.224.17 (talk) 14:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Non-existent categories

It's difficult to assume good faith with someone who has a history of disruptions, a wall of warnings, and who continues to submit problematic content. That said, I'll make one last assumption that you are here to be constructive. In the following edits, you add series to non-existent (redlinked) categories [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Please stop. Per WP:CAT#Articles, categories need to exist before you start tagging articles. I think you know this, since I'm pretty sure I've mentioned this to you in the past via one of the other IPs you've used. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for refusing to engage in discussion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   —SMALLJIM  16:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Please provide references for your edits – if you don't I'll be forced to block you again, because what you are doing looks like vandalism and you need to prove that it isn't.  —SMALLJIM  18:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Well at least you've shown that you're reading this page and that you know how to do references [14], even if it wasn't a reference to anything you added... But why are you not talking to anyone? Am I wasting my time trying to communicate with a unrepentant vandal, or is there some hope that you might start being an asset to the project? It's up to you - showing respect for other editors by, for example, adding references when your edits are called into question, and by replying to questions are central requirements of being a part of the community here, as the fourth of Wikipedia's Five pillars explains. If you don't want to be part of the community, well, I can easily block you again. Let me know what you intend, by replying to this message. Thanks,  —SMALLJIM  20:10, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sears. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for there being no change in your behaviour since the last block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   —SMALLJIM  18:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Breadwinners (TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Diff: [15] and at Problem Solverz and Sanjay and Craig. Repeated submission of unsourced analyses and introduction of user's personal bias. Admins see also 50.8.37.64 Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunday Pants (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sunday Pants and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello! 50.240.235.141, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Comedians (Beavis and Butt-head), will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. As before and what led to previous blocks - disruptive editing, addition of non-existant categories to articles Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Sunday Pants concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sunday Pants, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sunday Pants

Hello, 50.240.235.141. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Sunday Pants".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Sunday Pants}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

---