June 2024

edit

Why are you deleting information from pages of historical figures with the edit summary "current consensus is to limit the template to four generations"? It does not seem to be vandalism but you seem to be removing a lot of information that could be important. CGP05 (talk) 01:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

There was discussion about this on Template talk:Ahnentafel, where the concern was due to excessiveness. I was following the example of several others who removed those generations from that template. 2601:249:9301:D570:A816:92C7:D319:2ABA (talk) 01:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Can you help us identify where on that talk page you're finding the current consensus? I clicked through from one of your edit summaries but Template talk:Ahnentafel is almost 250kb of text.
Noting that I currently have no opinion on your edits per se, all the conversations on the linked talkpage are from three to five years ago, so I'm wondering why this is suddenly a priority. Folly Mox (talk) 10:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I did it because despite the efforts of people such as User:Surtsicna (who was one of the people who argued in favor of only four generations), not all of the pages that use the template had been appropriately edited, so I decided to check them in one fell swoop. 2601:249:9301:D570:A816:92C7:D319:2ABA (talk) 12:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don't see any consensus on that talk page, just a huge unresolved argument. Furius (talk) 20:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Afonso, Hereditary Prince of Portugal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mabyn Pajari (talk) 13:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't doing vandalism, I removed those items as there has been a growing sentiment that going beyond four generations in the Template:Ahnentafel, as discussed at Template talk:Ahnentafel, is excessive and of limited relevance. 2601:249:9301:D570:A816:92C7:D319:2ABA (talk) 13:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Henry Somerset, 1st Duke of Beaufort, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mabyn Pajari (talk) 13:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Thaksin Shinawatra, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mabyn Pajari (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Again, please see my response above. 2601:249:9301:D570:A816:92C7:D319:2ABA (talk) 13:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
IP, This user is an LTA, worry not about the notices they are giving. Lynch44 (talk) 13:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Mabyn Pajari. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tokugawa Yorinobu have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Mabyn Pajari (talk) 13:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I gave my reasoning above. 2601:249:9301:D570:A816:92C7:D319:2ABA (talk) 13:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm TCO. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John George I, Elector of Saxony have been reverted because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TCO (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I removed those generations, since Template talk:Ahnentafel supports limiting the template to four generations. 2601:249:9301:D570:A816:92C7:D319:2ABA (talk) 00:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John George I, Elector of Saxony. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TCO (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I listed my reasoning in the previous section. 2601:249:9301:D570:A816:92C7:D319:2ABA (talk) 03:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Hello 2601:249:9301:D570:A816:92C7:D319:2ABA, This is a warning regarding your recent edits to Wikipedia. Your actions have been identified as vandalism and disruptive editing, which violate Wikipedia's guidelines. Specifically, your edits on Richard Benyan, Robert I, Duke of Parma and etc, were inappropriate because your explanation does not adhere to Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Wikipedia is a collaborative platform that relies on the good faith of its contributors to maintain accurate and reliable information. Continued vandalism or disruptive behavior can result in being blocked from editing.

Your recent edits have not adhered to this guideline. Please refrain from making further disruptive edits. Continued vandalism or non-compliance with Wikipedia’s guidelines may result in a block or ban from editing. If you have any questions or need clarification on how to properly contribute to Wikipedia, feel free to ask or refer to Wikipedia’s guidelines and policies. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation and remember I will report you to a Wikipedia administrator if I need to.

Best regards,

MackoGqn MackoGqn (talk) 20:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply