Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello 2600:8800:FF0E:1200:F4A0:C59D:9AC4:A409, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to List of Outlander episodes have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — TAnthonyTalk 21:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Vandalism edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SgThomas (talk) 23:50, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017 edit

  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:36, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Suspected multi-accounts edit

The edit pattern of 96.83.146.222 indicates that you and him may be 2 faux-nez of a single editor. This practice of multi-accounts management for argumentative gain is forbidden. Yug (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Murchison-Eye (talk) 04:21, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Murchison-Eye (talk) 08:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dear IP edit

Will you please add the medium name between round brackets in the main text when you edit 'Current Events'? You may also avoid the terse 'headline' style and use the more elaborate, descriptive style. Thank you. Wakari07 (talk) 15:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reverting edits on this page? edit

Hello? Did you study some of the more basic Wikipedia protocols? How is it answering the previous message to revert a *good faith* edit? Wakari07 (talk) 15:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please read WP:DISCUSSION Wakari07 (talk) 15:42, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Portal:Current events/2017 October 24.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. . - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Portal:Current events/2017 October 24.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 16:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
  • Dude. The sockpuppet accusations are just ridiculous. Drmies (talk) 16:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Just some advice for when you return, try listening to other editors. Had you formatted your news stories in the right way and/or discussed the additions first then you wouldn't be in this situation of getting frustrated. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Content dispute for the Portal talk:Current events/2018 March 6 article. Nil Einne (talk) 14:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply