Open main menu

User talk:Wakari07

Contents

August 2018Edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Crimean Bridge (Crimea). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:52, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Again, I'm not edit warring. Please read up on WP:BRD. Wakari07 (talk) 11:15, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for spelling out arguments on Talk:Crimean Bridge (Crimea). Wakari07 (talk) 13:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

AlertEdit

 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for this notification/alert. Also, re: on your user page question: the blood type parameter serves to distinguish between hot and cold blooded, red and blue blooded, good and bad blooded users :=p Wakari07 (talk) 11:22, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Infrabel logo color (160px) .jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Infrabel logo color (160px) .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Somewhat pro-Russian activism done by user:Wakari07Edit

Hi there, I have noticed that you keep reverting some of my edits regarding recent illness that happened in Salisbury. There is no evidence that this was done by Russia or whether it was an actual Novichok poisoning or not. Nevertheless it is important to mention that the police in Hazmat suits are deployed in the area due to concerns of past 2 poisonings. Several articles mention there are tensions due to this. I have noticed you keep removing the sentencing of Novichok and Skripal connections from the recent events. Please take a time to consider this removes the most important factor of the event and somewhat misinforms people on the recent case. Marjdabi (talk) 21:55, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Did you somewhat inform GCHQ and the CIA? Wakari07 (talk) 21:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

ANI notificationEdit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wakari07. Marjdabi (talk) 22:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ahvaz National Resistance for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahvaz National Resistance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahvaz National Resistance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fatemi 18:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Personal attacksEdit

This diff where you accuse me of vandalism (breaking a ref by mistake would not be vandalism, nor does it seem this even happened per my check) - or saying a different user has a "your preferred terrorist agency " is not cool. Far from cool. Please explain why I should not report this rather serious personal attack. Icewhiz (talk) 00:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

You should report whatever you feel the need to report, even admit you're on the same mission as the user you're defending. But you're right on the "link breaking" edit, that was not yours. My mistake, apologies for that. Wakari07 (talk) 03:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Mission? What mission? Whom exactly am I defending? Icewhiz (talk) 06:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
That "different user", Mardjabi, remember? You threaten me here to report me on ANI for what I wrote on ANI... where I argued that the guy used social media and tabloid sources to push the unverified (and arguably unverifiable) claims of one terrorist agency over another. Maybe those discussions were somewhat heated. Wakari07 (talk) 18:45, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Timeline of young people's rights in France for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of young people's rights in France is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of young people's rights in France until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 23:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Wakari07. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

edit warEdit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Waskerton (talk) 03:24, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

All we have to do is Keep Talking. Wakari07 (talk) 03:38, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30Edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bernardo Bertolucci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Good bot. Now hush. Wakari07 (talk) 18:47, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security AgencyEdit

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from here. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

This reminds me that I should put a key logger on my devices. Now I can't argue. Wakari07 (talk) 04:53, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Here is a link to the bot report. Click on the iThenticate link to view the overlap. The list-like material is okay to copy, but the surrounding prose is not. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 05:34, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback. Wakari07 (talk) 09:51, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9Edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brussels bombings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Fixed. Wakari07 (talk) 09:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

SuspicionEdit

Hi, I suspect that Waskerton, Flickotown and Wildcursive are actually one person. The editing style, the language use, and the focus is very similar. Also see diff. Best, Tobby72 (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Wakari07".