209.22.221.73

Welcome!

Hello 209.22.221.73! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (209.22.221.73) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - wolf 22:12, 29 November 2018 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Conflict of Interest

Hello, 209.22.221.73. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.
Note: Please ensure that you are familiar with Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines, especially before you edit any articles related to the United States military or government. Thank you - wolf 22:12, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Contents

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
March 2013 IOMC Article Moved here from User:Hasteur Hello, my article has been denied due to lack of sources. Unfortunately there are not that many sources out there with information on the Iron Order. What can be done on my end to get this article published? Hello, unfortunately without sources we can't verify the content and determine notability. Per Wikipedia policies (WP:N and WP:V) Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Per your own admission there's not that many sources for the subject, so it's very unlikely that this article will be promoted to mainspace. But if you're willing to put in the effort the following issues need to be addressed The article must be cited and referenced similar to other clubs of note in List of motorcycle clubs The article must have a demonstration of notability similar to the other clubs (What makes this one special that it deserves a article?" The article must have the majority of it's references be from independent reliable sources that have a history of editorial oversight. If all of these things pass, then there is a chance that the article can be improved. Furthermore I see that this IP address has only interacted once in relation to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Iron Order Motorcycle Club 2, whereas User:Mongo0915 has done significant work on the article. If you are one in the same please edit while logged in. Editing as an IP address while also retaining a user name is considered poor form (Per WP:LOGGEDOUT) and could lay the groundwork for a question of sock-puppetry. I will not ask you to confirm the assiciation between this IP address and the user, however it would be wise to verify that you are logged in prior to saving. Hasteur (talk) 19:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC) January 2014 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Little Match Girl Passion has been reverted. Your edit here to The Little Match Girl Passion was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL22878365B5404297) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:01, 22 January 2014 (UTC) March 2014 Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Irregular warfare may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: * [{Terrorism/][Counter-terrorism]] It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC) May 2014 Hello, I'm Solarra. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Orzo (pasta), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 14:26, 6 May 2014 (UTC) April 2015 Hello, I'm TYelliot. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tampa, Florida— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 13:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC) June 2015 Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Fruitcake— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:53, 5 June 2015 (UTC) August 2015 Your submission at Articles for creation: STEVEN VANHORN (August 11) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:STEVEN VANHORN and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors. - Happysailor (Talk) 19:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC) July 2017 Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jim McElwain— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 15:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jim McElwain. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 15:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jim McElwain, you may be blocked from editing. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 15:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jim McElwain. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 15:20, 25 July 2017 (UTC) November 2017 Hello. Your recent edit to Lincoln Heights, Ohio appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 05:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC) May 2018 Hello, I'm NiciVampireHeart. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Air Canada Centre have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. NiciVampireHeart 16:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC) August 2018 Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Quokka— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 18:48, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 75th Ranger Regiment (United States), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - wolf 21:31, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020

Hello, I'm Johand199. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Marxism—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Johand199 ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 17:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

---