Your submission at Articles for creation: Ustad Khalil Gudaz (March 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Rankersbo (talk) 21:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! 207.62.206.209, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 21:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


Recent edit to Jamie's Elsewhere edit

  Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! —M@sssly 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Joshua Reynolds has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:08, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

September 2015 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Claudette Colvin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2017 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rev. John Thomas Becher. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 21:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your help desk question edit

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  gadfium 18:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Rsfinlayson. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kea have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.

May 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kea have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:55, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kea. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 17:56, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to trigger the edit filter, as you did at Kea, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 18:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kea, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 18:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you trigger the edit filter, as you did at Kea. CLCStudent (talk) 18:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kea. CLCStudent (talk) 18:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.