August 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Richard Pearse has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. --  Darth Mike  (Talk Contribs) 06:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Taylor (Australian rules footballer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jenks24 (talk) 07:12, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Earth Hour, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. LegoKontribsTalkM 07:07, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

January 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Firefighting worldwide, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 01:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

June 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to American Advertising Federation Hall of Fame, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

November 2012

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Australia Post has been reverted.
Your edit here to Australia Post was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/australiapost) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

December 2013

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Oman ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm PamD. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Hyde Park, Leeds because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PamD 10:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Hasselhoff. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 05:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm 172.56.39.50. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Moai without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 172.56.39.50 (talk) 04:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ray Wilkins, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018

edit

  This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Jake Donaghey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jim1138 (talk) 03:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 05:43, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm JackintheBox. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to June 21— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. JACKINTHEBOXTALK 06:18, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply