User talk:2/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:2. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
The Signpost: 30 August 2010
- In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities
- Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000
- Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?
The Signpost: 6 September 2010
- Book review: Cognitive Surplus, by Clay Shirky
- WikiProject report: Putting articles in their place: the Uncategorized Task Force
- Features and admins: Bumper crop of admins; Obama featured portal marks our 150th
- Arbitration report: Interim desysopping, CU/OS appointments, and more
- Technology report: Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management
Orphaned non-free image File:Riskywoods gameover.png
Thanks for uploading File:Riskywoods gameover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 September 2010
- News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes
- Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment
- Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration
- WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab
- Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Clerk elections
Hi, this is just to inform you that elections for Clerkship at WP:UAA have started on the talk page. You have been sent this message because you were recently active in handling submissions or discussions. Discussion is ongoing and you are encouraged to voice your opinion on the candidates.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Fridae'sDoom (talk) at 06:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC).
HBC Archive Indexerbot
The HBC Archive Indexerbot reports an error "12:13:20 19 September 2010: Not writing to User talk:2/Archive index as I cannot find permission (sourced from: User talk:2)". At that archive index page you have already put some content, that bot won't overwrite. You have to give permission to the bot by initiating the page. Is your intention to create a archive index or keep the current? I can help you to edit configs. --Kslotte (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 September 2010
- From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost
- News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
- In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
- Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 September 2010
- News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more
- WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Irving Literary Society article is up for review 1
Hope I am not messing up this pretty page; but you were kind enough to review the page last summer and gave us some nice thoughts. Here is where the review is taking place: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Active_discussions It is under 1 October 2010.--Cmagha (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 October 2010
- WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes
- Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news
The Signpost: 11 October 2010
- News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more
- In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution
- Features and admins: Big week for ships and music
- Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Deletion
I noticed your past involvement in deletions regarding unaccredited schools and would appreciate your input here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harbert Hills Academy. WikiManOne (talk) 05:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 October 2010
- News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief
- WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics
- Features and admins: A week for marine creatures
- Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review
- Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months
- Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news
Orphaned non-free image File:AndC.png
Thanks for uploading File:AndC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
I reverted your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taisha miller. The AFD does not meet the criteria for a Speedy keep/early close. There are still outstanding delete !votes. ~~ GB fan ~~ 17:47, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't close it as speedy keep, I closed it as a "withdrawal by nominator." My understanding was that the nom could withdraw an AfD at any time during the discussion, and I've done this before without any problems... 2 says you, says two 20:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- What you call it doesn't make any difference, you closed the discussion early, that makes it a speedy keep. Since others have !voted delete, your close does not meet the applicability of the guideline. You should go back to the AFD and strike through your nomination to show you no longer feel the article should be deleted. If you disagree you can always raise the question at WT:AFD. ~~ GB fan ~~ 03:58, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Re: Music Fund
Hi,
I updated the Music Fund page so that the "NGO (which?)" remark is cleared according to my understanding. I also added additional references and improved the reference section's formatting.
Jef Kazak (talk) 19:43, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Looks good, thanks for letting me know. 2 says you, says two 02:42, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 October 2010
- News and notes: Mike Godwin leaves the Foundation, ArbCom election announced
- In the news: Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news
- WikiProject report: Nightmare on Wiki Street: WikiProject Horror
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- ArbCom interview: So what is being an arbitrator actually like?
- Arbitration report: Case closes within 1 month
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hello 2, I'm pretty sure A7 only applies to articles, so I'm declining your CSD nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nate Rothacker for now. If I'm missing something, please let me know. Regards, Airplaneman ✈ 03:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- I nominate AFC creations for speedy deletion if no further work is done on them after being declined and they meet one of the CSD criteria if they had been created as articles. Had Nate Rothacker been an article, I'm almost certian it would have been huffed by now. 2 says you, says two 03:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure why you tagged it for a hoax; although the claims were exaggerated, the first g-hit was a source that established his existence and notability. I fixed it up a bit and added a reference; it's in no way a model for new articles, but it was salvageable. Thought I'd let you know. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oh shit, I must have hit the wrong button in twinkle. It was supposed to be a {{db-bio}} because the references were not substantial coverage. 2 says you, says two 04:49, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- No big deal; I do that with some frequency, I don't know how many times I've accidentally tagged non-notable songs as {{db-a10}}. If I hadn't happened to see a couple other articles that user created, I'd have A7ed it as well, so don't worry, it's not you. I left the user a note telling them to include more/better references, which seems to have had some effect. Thanks!! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 05:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oh shit, I must have hit the wrong button in twinkle. It was supposed to be a {{db-bio}} because the references were not substantial coverage. 2 says you, says two 04:49, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
More helpful reasons?
I appreciate your work at AfC, but if I may comment... Here the reason given is true, but could be more specific - this would be more helpful to authoring editors. As the full text of the tag says "Your submission did not meet our criteria, but if you can address the reasons given, you are encouraged to make improvements and resubmit it." --Lexein (talk) 01:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 November 2010
- In the news: Airplane construction with Wikipedia, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric
- WikiProject report: Scoring with WikiProject Ice Hockey
- Features and admins: Good-lookin' slugs and snails
- Arbitration report: Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days
- Technology report: Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news
Altered speedy deletion rationale: KMC Controls
Hello 2. I am just letting you know that I deleted KMC Controls, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 8 November 2010
- News and notes: Second Wikipedian in Residence, {{citation needed}} for sanity
- WikiProject report: WikiProject California
- Features and admins: No, not science fiction—real science
- Election report: The countdown begins
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions reduced for one party; History ban extended
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 15 November 2010
- News and notes: Fundraisers start for Wikipedia and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership
- WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon
- Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains
- Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
my sources
Hello 2,
You have said on my new article that the sources are not reputable, but they are 2 sources, one is EDU and one is newspaper. Could you please explain what source i am not allowed to use?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Andy_Hollinden
Elika2010 (talk) 17:42, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sources must be independent and non-trivial, the sources on the IU.edu website are inherently not independent as Dr. Hollinden is a professor at the school. While I couldn't read the entireity of the CD review as its behind a paywall, my understanding is that it is a review of an ensemble he participated in, in general this would not be sufficient by itself for a Wikipedia article as notability is not inherited. Sources aside, it doesn't seem like his contributions satisfy the guidelines in WP:PROF - merely being a tenured professor, even at a major institution is not an indicator of notability in it of itself, but if you can find academic papers he has written and are frequently cited by other musicians or professors, he may be notable. 2 says you, says two 18:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- I see, I understand, I was looking at the .edu being a good source and his personal site not being one, i did not look at with the .edu connection because my main focus of this was to get his MUSIC listed... now if i do edits regarding his MUSIC and not him being a teacher at IU, can is use the .EDU for a reference for his other profession being a musician?
Elika2010 (talk) 21:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello again Mr 2... I have read what you said on the article, i dont know how but i forgot to put my main source that he has developed courses at IU, this is the [source here] ... if i added this source does it make him notable enough, and not to mention, he is ALREADY listed on en.wiki as a [Current notable faculty] ... Please review and advise before i waste time and submit my article again, I will also send this to the other person who looked at it today.
Elika2010 (talk) 22:16, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
About my submission - GoJiyo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/GoJiyo
My previous article submission GoJiyo has been declined saying that, "This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject."
Can you explain me why is it so? I have many credible sources for the article direct from the brand/corporate of [Godrej], [GoJiyo], [CNBC-TV18], [Virtualworld] and more.
There are various articles present currently which are of same look & feel. Please review the above mentioned article & advise the appropriate steps. Looking forward for a positive reply. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sashimimoshi (talk • contribs) 11:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 November 2010
- News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations
- Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder
- WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Candidates still stepping forward
- Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 29 November 2010
- In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report
- WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Voting in full swing
- Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 6 December 2010
- News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive
- WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak
- WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup
- Features and admins: Birds and insects
- Arbitration report: New case: World War II
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 13 December 2010
- Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: The community has spoken
- Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 December 2010
- News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
- Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland
- Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Majestic Titans
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News