1a2b3c4f

May 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Potion—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 03:31, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indivisibility Potion (May 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Amkgp was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not an instruction manual, guidebook, or textbook as per WP:NOTMANUAL

~Amkgp ✉ 05:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, 1a2b3c4f! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Amkgp ✉ 05:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Indivisibility Potion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Indivisibility Potion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~Amkgp ✉ 05:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:1a2b3c4f/sandbox

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:1a2b3c4f/sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cahk (talk) 07:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Warning

Apart from the fact that you apparently can't spell "invisibility", Wikipedia isn't the place to mess around. I'm not blocking you at the moment, but if you make further such edits, I will do so. Deb (talk) 07:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC)