Welcome! edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 161.112.232.111, has made unconstructive edits, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Kkmurray (talk) 15:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

February 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ginger, you may be blocked from editing. Arctic Kangaroo 14:49, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

April 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Kazakhstan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

November 2013 edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Everton F.C.. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Learning, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 17:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

161.112.232.111 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Incorrectly blocked as an open proxy. The 161.112.232.* IPs are the secure web proxy servers for the University of Huddersfield's internal network.

Accept reason:

Confirmed not to be an open proxy (per WP:OPP). Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 18:16, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Referring to WP:OPP for a check. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Midlands because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 11:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Reasoning system— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Non-Dropframe talk 11:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reasoning system with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Non-Dropframe talk 11:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Time-of-flight mass spectrometry, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kkmurray (talk) 15:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm IndigoTiger. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Neil Redfearn without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IndigoTiger (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:161.112.232.111. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Removing warnings is also vandalism Zamaster4536 (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Neil Redfearn. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Boomer VialHolla 15:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Neil Redfearn. Also, sentences such as "Not anymore he isn't" is in violation of NPOV. Please refrain from adding those kind of non-neutral comments. Boomer VialHolla 15:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Oh, sorry about that last revert. I see that you've added a source. Boomer VialHolla 15:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

ha ha he heh

Your recent edits edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Neil Redfearn shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Zamaster4536 (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  WaggersTALK 15:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Correction: The block is for edit warring, not for BLP violations. WaggersTALK 08:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Black history. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TwoTwoHello (talk) 16:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Phat Girlz, you may be blocked from editing. TwoTwoHello (talk) 16:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Doug Weller talk 17:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to How to Get Away with Murder have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dan Koehl (talk) 15:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leeds United F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nzd (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Collin Quaner, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 14:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chris Pearson (boxer). -NottNott|talk 16:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply