April 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Human evolution has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Laurent Koscielny, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

August 2010 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Manuel Almunia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Manuel Almunia was changed by 140.168.135.1 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-08-18T03:59:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Worms (series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. 1exec1 (talk) 02:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Weetoddid (talk) 06:51, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Nick Skitz, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tomayres (talk) 01:05, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Muslim world, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 11:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Handley Page Halifax, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.  Velella  Velella Talk   23:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Handley Page Halifax constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   23:20, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2011 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dorothy Parker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 08:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2011 edit

  Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Tony Woodcock (rugby player). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:50, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of selective high schools in New South Wales. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Granville boys is not a selective high school. Please point out reliable sources to back your claim otherwise. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 05:51, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Delta Goodrem, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 21:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

May 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Piker, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 08:40, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ramoji Rao, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 04:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

July 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Malke 2010 (talk) 03:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bandaranaike International Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Dubai International Airport|Dubai-International]], [[Ibrahim Nasir International Airport|Malé]]|,[[[Singapore Changi Airport|Singapore]]
  • defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20070326_01 |title=Situation at Katunayake brought totally under control [5th Lead&#93; |publisher=Defence.lk |date= |accessdate=19 October 2011}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm K6ka. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Eclipse (breath freshener), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 11:50, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm NYBrook098. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Yesterday because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NYBrook098 (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Victoria Mitchell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016 edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mauritian Australians. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. ... richi (hello) 08:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sports (Huey Lewis and the News album) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:16, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Baileys Irish Cream have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 10:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018 edit

  Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Ian Narev. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:54, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Anand Kumar, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

May 2019 edit

  Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:41, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:43, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ross (name). Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019 edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Christianity in Tamil Nadu; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ifnord (talk) 01:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Jack90s15. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Jack90s15 (talk) 02:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

February 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Sennecaster. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Rebecca Miller, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sennecaster (Chat) 05:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Admantine123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Admantine123 (talk) 11:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply