Welcome!

edit

Hi જય શ્રી રામ! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! JarrahTree 06:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

About your username

edit

Hello! While non-Latin usernames are allowed on Wikipedia, per policy on non-Latin character usernames, a Latin-character transliteration of your username and/or in your signature would be greatly appreciated. However, this is not required, only encouraged. Welcome again to Wikipedia! Schrödinger's jellyfish  02:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello again, જય શ્રી રામ. I've seen you again in recent changes. A Latin-character transliteration on your user page, or in your signature, would be greatly appreciated, as we have a lot of editors who are unable to type in Gujarati (which Google Translate is telling me your name is). It makes collaboration a lot easier and makes it more clear who we're talking to if multiple users with non-Latin usernames participate in a discussion or edit the same article. Schrödinger's jellyfish  17:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Annh07. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Template:Infobox former subdivision/doc have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Annh07 (talk) 14:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Newar people. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see WP:NOINDICSCRIPT. CodeTalker (talk) 18:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 15:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Joshua Jonathan, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/જય શ્રી રામ. You may have seen more of them. Drmies (talk) 16:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:YilevBot per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/YilevBot. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 00:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply