User:Wyyz02/The United States Helps and Beware of Taiwan

The United States Helps and Beware of Taiwan

In April 2001, then-U.S. President George W. Bush publicly announced that the United States was cooperating with Taiwan.In 2017, the US National Security Council proposed the Indo-Pacific Strategic Framework, which, in the assumption of armed conflict between the US and the People's Republic of China, "defends the First Island Chain, including Taiwan".It was approved by President Donald Trump in 2018.In February 2021, U.S. Congressmen - reintroduced the Prevention of Taiwan Aggression Bill, which would legally authorize the President of the United States to use limited force to defend Taiwan if necessary.

The US government has long maintained a strategy of strategic ambiguity on the Taiwan issue.

Before breaking off friendship

United States Inter-Defense Taiwan Defense Command

After the break of friendship

In 1996, when the Taiwan Strait crisis broke out, the United States sent its 7th Fleet to help defend Taiwan and stabilize the situation.

In April 2001, US President George W. Bush declared "do everything in his power to defend Taiwan."President-elect Barack Obama has not made a public and clear statement about the People's Republic of China's military alliance with Taiwan and the United States.The Indo-Pacific strategic framework approved by President Donald Trump in 2018 included "defending Taiwan" .

The authors point out that "the U.S. [government] has not made any specific commitments" in the Law on Relations with Taiwan and the six assurances that the U.S. is considered the legal basis for cooperating with Taiwan."In terms of legal principles and obligations," he said, "The U.S. government is likely to refrain from armed intervention after the president and Congress decide on appropriate actions to take in accordance with constitutional procedures."So, under Donald Trump and Joe Biden, US Congressmen pushed bills to fulfill America's legal mandate to defend Taiwan.

George W. Bush Administration

In 2001, the new U.S. administration adopted a tough policy of treating the People's Republic of China as a strategic competitor.On April 24, the United States announced arms sales to Taiwan (three arms purchases).U.S. President George W. Bush said on ABC's "Good Morning America" Tuesday that the U.S. arms package for Taiwan is now "right package for the moment" , and that the U.S. President George W. Bush also said, "Whatever it look to defend herself"According to the media, this means that the United States is ready to be directly involved in the Taiwan Strait conflict.Bush's move also turned the US government's "strategic ambiguity" policy toward Taiwan into "strategic clarity" ."What I want to say to the people is that we want to resolve any differences peacefully," Bush said in an interview with CNN on Saturday."But as people know, I'm willing to help Taiwan defend itself, and as far as I'm concerned, there's no change in [our] policy, as other presidents have said, and I'll continue to say."When asked about the attitude of the US government if Taiwan's declaration of independence triggers conflict."I certainly hope that Taiwan will adhere to the one-China principle," he said.The declaration of Taiwan's independence is not a one-China policy, and we will work with Taiwan to ensure that it does not happen.We need a peaceful solution to this problem."

On May 17, Bush met with Asia-Pacific leaders of the American community at the White House.He reiterated that the United States would assist Taiwan if mainland China "would use force".The following year, George W. Bush visited China to reaffirm the one-China policy of the United States Government."When my country comes to an agreement [the three Sino-US joint communiqués], we stick to it," he said. "But there is also a Law on Relations with Taiwan, which I respect.It stipulates that if Taiwan is attacked, we will help it defend itself.But we also made it clear that neither side should provoke, peaceful dialogue."

The Trump Administration

In 2018, President Donald Trump launched a US-China trade war.China and the United States have entered a state of long-term, strong confrontation.Republican Senator Josh Hawley introduces the Taiwan Defense Act in the Senate on June 10, 2020.On June 30, Republican Representatives Ted Yoho and Mike Gallagher introduced the Taiwan Defense Bill in the House of Representatives.On 29 July, Ted Johor introduced the (H.R. 7855 - Taiwan Invasion Prevention Act )to clarify and strengthen America's commitment to defend Taiwan in the event of an armed attack.Earlier on July 17, Ted Johor told Fox Business Channel host Lou Dobbs: "The bill would make it clear that if China invaded Taiwan, it would authorize the US president to use force to respond, with a five-year sunset clause."The bill is not on the agenda because of the presidential election.

On January 5, 2021, just days before President Donald Trump's inauguration, the White House National Security Council decrypts confidential documents from the 2017 Indo-Pacific Strategic Framework.President Donald Trump ratified the document in February 2018.National Security Assistant Robert O'Brien said in a January 5 decryption memorandum that the decryption was a transparent demonstration of America's strategic commitment to Indo-Pacific and regional allies and partners.On 12 January, the White House NSC released documents .Article 4 of the document, addressing the People's Republic of China's seven major goals, states "to prevent China from using force against the United States and its allies and partners, and to develop capabilities and programmes to defeat China in various conflicts."Among them, "develop and implement a defense strategy that includes but is not limited to the following three points": 1. deprive China of continuous air and sea control in the first island chain; 2. defend the first island chain countries, including Taiwan; 3. dominate all areas outside the first island chain.

Biden Administration

On January 20, 2021, the new President Joe Biden took office, still implementing a hard-line policy toward China, and the China–United States trade war continues.On February 18, after the opening of the new Congress, Republican Senators Rick Scott and Representative Guy Lorin Reschenthaler reintroduced the Taiwan Invasion Prevention Act in both houses of Congress.Proposal by Rick Scott (S.332 - Taiwan Invention Prevention Act ) Relevant: Helping Taiwan countercommunist China's military build-up across the Taiwan Strait; Establishment of a limited authorization for the Preservation of the Taiwan Strait.

In the face of military pressure from the People's Republic of China, Richard Haas, president of the Council on Foreign Relations , and some US Congressmen have argued that the US government should use strategic clarity to deter the possibility of reunifying Taiwan.On April 29, the Senate Armed Services Committee held a hearing on the global threat facing the United States.When Democratic Senator Jack Reid, the chairman of the hearing, asked if the United States Government responded to domestic political calls and changed its vague strategy, "by adopting an approach that was clearly committed to Taiwan (Republic of China), how would the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China react?"National Intelligence Director Avril Haines replied that the People's Republic of China believed that a clear US cooperation in defending Taiwan would "create great instability", making the People's Republic of China "aggressively undermine American interests around the world".

Kurt Campbell, the India-Pacific policy coordinator of the National Security Council, faced calls from U.S. officials for a clear stance on Taiwan at a seminar hosted by the Financial Times on May 4, citing "significant disadvantages."If the People's Republic of China were to unite Taiwan and the United States to defend Taiwan, "any conflict over Taiwan is unlikely to be confined to a small geographical area."

On October 21, when asked on CNN, "If China attacks Taiwan, will the U.S. defend Taiwan?" U.S. President Joe Biden twice said, "Yes, we do."The White House spokesman said yesterday, "The president's remarks are not an announcement that there has been any change in our policy."U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austen at NATO headquarters in Brussels said the U.S. would continue to support Taiwan's troops, but declined to confirm Biden's pledge to defend Taiwan militarily in the event of an attack by mainland China.Asked about the risk of NATO forces being involved in a potential conflict between the United States and the People's Republic of China, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg declined to "speculate a hypothetical situation".

In April 2022, former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe wrote in a US newspaper comparing Taiwan to Ukraine, saying the US should make a clear commitment to help defend Taiwan."Individual Japanese politicians continue to talk nonsense about China's internal affairs and provoke major powers to confront each other," Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said at a regular press conference on April 15.China firmly opposes this.Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese territory.The question of Taiwan is entirely an internal affair of China and is fundamentally different from the question of Ukraine. It can be said that there is no comparison.Japan has committed an unspeakable crime against Taiwan for half a century and is responsible for serious historical crimes against the Chinese people.In particular, Japanese politicians should be cautious about what they say and do to avoid sending the wrong signals to the forces of "Taiwan independence."

On May 23, 2022, U.S. President Joe Biden made it clear at a joint press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida that he would send U.S. troops to defend Taiwan.The next day Biden said his "strategic ambiguity" policy toward Taiwan remained unchanged.

On September 17, 2022, Biden reiterated in an interview with CBS' Sixty Minutes Current Affairs Magazine that he would send troops when China attacked Taiwan.

After the war, the possible U.S. cooperative defense approach

Wang Yunfei, a senior researcher at the Hong Kong think tank, divides the United States into two categories: short-range and long-range.Short-range assistance is supported by U.S. troops stationed in Japan and South Korea.Long-range assistance is provided by the U. S. military worldwide, including the U. S. mainland.

According to a 2004 article by Wang Yifeng of the People's Republic of China, the U.S. military force used to defend Taiwan is mainly 300,000 troops belonging to the U.S. Pacific Command and part of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces.The U.S. Seventh Fleet was the main force.There are three modes of military co-defence

Vietnamese model

Similar to the Vietnam War, the U.S. military concentrated its main forces, imposing a key maritime blockade and rapid deployment against the People's Republic of China.

North Korea model

Similar to the Korean War, the U.S. military sent some troops directly to Taiwan.

Japanese model

After the Chinese People's Liberation Army captured Taiwan Island, the U.S. military carried out operations in the form of the New Britain Campaign and wiped out the PLA on Taiwan Island.Wang Yifeng thinks this is the first choice for the U.S. military.

According to the 2006 article, "America is well known for its fear of casualties," the U.S. military will not land on Taiwan to wage a ground war with the People's Liberation Army. "Based on the personnel and equipment of the People's Liberation Army at that time, Hai-mast thought that Wu Tong Taiwan was "no problem" and that the PLA had only a "very good chance of winning" in the face of joint defense of Taiwan by the United States and Japan

The U.S. Navy has formed a joint formation of two or three aircraft carrier groups and Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force to "hold and even destroy the PLA's naval and air forces."This is a relatively safe choice for the United States and Japan, and the losses are acceptable.The sea masts speculated that the US aircraft carrier group would fight the PLA 600 kilometers east of the Taiwan Sea theater.In the battle with the United States, Japan and Taiwan for control of the air in the Taiwan Sea, it is not easy for the PLA to guarantee relative control of the air.The PLA will not be able to win the war by simply using nuclear submarines as a deterrent because of the possible absence of air control.At that time, the People's Liberation Army-owned Su-30 and J-7 fighter war radius is only about 1,000 kilometers, not enough to pose a big threat to the U.S. fleet.The sea mast hopes to introduce no fewer than 12 Russian backfire bombers, ideally 40, so that the PLA can "saturate attack" on the U.S. aircraft carrier group, helping the PLA to "concentrate its superior forces for air control in the Taiwan Strait."

The sea mast speculated that South Korea might not allow the U.S. military to "take off and land at its airports" in view of its "good relationship" with the People's Republic of China.The U.S. Pacific Air Force's Fifth Air Force Kadena Air Force Base in Japan will be the main bridgehead for wartime, U.S. and Japan.Sea masts also refer to the PLA's possible long-distance raids on military installations in Japan, such as Nagasaki, Yokohama, and Yokosuka, to prevent the U.S. and Japan from cooperating with Taiwan.In order to prevent Japan, Japan and the U.S. from entering an all-out war, the U.S. will "restrain" the use of these bases (such as tankers and P-3C anti-submarine aircraft) and rely on aircraft carrier combat groups rather than as major war airports."

After the 2010s, the People's Republic of China's military strength increased.Wang Yunfei's article pointed out that the two sides in the military conflict does not involve land targets, the PLA can complete the combat mission to Japan, the U. S. Forces Korea within three days.The United States should invest no less than the number of five aircraft carrier battle groups during the Iraq War in assisting Taiwan from a long distance.

After the war, America's non-military means

The United States may join forces with allies to impose economic sanctions (trade suspensions, embargoes, maritime blockades, freezing of financial assets, financial blockades), cyberwarfare, shielding of satellite navigation systems .

The People's Republic of China itself is the world's second largest economy after the United States, and its economy is highly dependent on international markets .In the financial sector, the US government is believed to be capable of ending its financial blockade of the People's Republic of China by removing it from the dollar-dominated global payment and settlement system, SWIFT.Excluding SWIFT could cost the People's Republic of China $300 billion a year in trade, more than $90 billion in foreign direct investment and $80 billion in foreign direct investment, Guotai Junan's July 2020 report said.The 2020 VOA website article on the US-China trade war notes that the PRC is unlikely to be excluded from SWIFT, like North Korea and Iran, because "it could pose risks to the US itself and the global economy."In 2015, the People's Bank of China began building a cross-border payment system for the renminbi.On the basis of the economic strength of the People's Republic of China and the mere "oral support" of the United States Government in the movement for the return of Hong Kong, the author of the Republic of China (Taiwan) said that the United States Government would not defend Taiwan by force.Taking grain and oil as examples, the 2020 New York Times article pointed out that the government of the People's Republic of China can solve the problem by increasing grain ownership, increasing oil reserves and signing long-term contracts with oil-producing countries.In the face of economic sanctions, the government of the People's Republic of China "is more important to solve the problem of the cut-off of imports and exports and key technologies in overseas markets, by building the economy on internal cycles and technological autonomy over the next 15 years.Once the West blocks China, Beijing can rely on this internal cycle.It can be said that the Fourteenth Five-Year Plan and the Vision 2035 Plan are part of this war preparedness.

On June 16, 2022, U.S. Senate Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Robert Menendez, a Democrat, and Republican chief member of the Senate Budget Committee, Lindsey Graham, co-sponsored the Taiwan Policy Act.The bill includes sanctions against the U.S., $4.5 billion over four years, granting Taiwan the status of a major non-NATO ally, and changing the name of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office to the Taiwan Representative Office.

Time taken for U.S. troops to reach Taiwan

The time it takes for US troops to reach the battlefield in the Taiwan Strait to assist in defense is related to the time when the ROC armed forces can defend the PLA.Wang Yunfei, a senior researcher at Hong Kong's Three Strategies think tank in 2020, said that public opinion across the Taiwan Straits has two distinct expectations of how long it will take to reunify Taiwan.Zhang Ziyang, an associate professor at the University of South China, wrote in 2008 that "in terms of Taiwan's current defense strategy and capabilities, it has become a common belief that it will be difficult to resist the PLA's two-week offensive."At a hearing on China's military modernization and its impact on the United States and the Asia-Pacific region held by the US Congressional Committee on Economic and Security Review in March 2007, witnesses agreed that China had an absolute advantage in the Taiwan Strait.Among them, Bernard Cole, a professor at the National War College, points out that Taiwan is unlikely to make it to the United States.

On March 9, 2021, US Indo-Pacific Command Commander Philip Davidson testified before the US Senate Armed Services Committee that the US Congress should increase its budget against China for fear of attacking Taiwan within six years.And "the first island chain from the United States [Taiwan] will take at least 17 days" Earlier, Wang Feiyun article pointed out that the U.S. Forces Korea, U.S. strategic bombers and fighter jets can be deployed on the same day, but the U.S. forces outside East Asia still need to form a carrier group to support them.The U.S. aircraft carrier fleet from Guam takes at least three days, and from bases outside Hawaii, most of it takes more than a week, and two weeks or more.

The Republic of China (Taiwan), for its part, raised the issue of Taiwan being able to defend itself for several days because of Philip Davidson's view that the U.S. military would travel for 17 days.On 17 March, the Minister of Defence of the Republic of China, Qiu Kuo, is taking up a question from the Legislative Yuan.Liao Wan-yu, a Kuomintang legislator, mentioned Philip Davidson's view and the outside world's view that the ROC armed forces can only defend for seven days.Chiu Kuo-cheng says that he never sets up a few days of defense, and that the Chinese Communists want to play for a few days. "Taiwan politician and host Zhao Shaokang based on the assumption that U.S. troops would be deployed to help defend Taiwan after the U.S. military build-up," the 17-day estimate is reasonable.The question is, how can Taiwan stand alone for 17 days, and Japan also has to shoulder some of the responsibility for these 17 days of absence."

U.S. troops re-entered Taiwan to help defend Taiwan before the war

In June 2004, the mainstream media of the Republic of China (Taiwan) reported that US military officers had arrived in Taiwan to re-establish their presence in Taiwan in 2006 .In 2020, against the backdrop of all-out confrontation between China and the United States, the issue of re-establishing the U. S. military presence in Taiwan was raised again before the war began.On March 7, Ian Easton of the U.S. 2049 Planning Research Institute wrote in a paper that the U.S. should send troops to Taiwan, calling for the U.S. military to form a mixed army, navy, air force and Marines.In June, Taiwan's networks began to spread fake news about the relocation of some US troops to Taiwan, increasing the number of US troops stationed in Germany to 50, 000, building at least three military bases, deploying F-35, Terminal High Altitude Area Defense , 50-20,000 medium-range ballistic missile , and even nuclear weapons.

The US Army's bimonthly magazine, the September and October Military Review, published a series of articles on the theme of "China's armed aggression against Taiwan" .Among them, the Marine Corps' current Captain Walker D. Mills: Return to Taiwan calls on the United States to reconsider the deployment of ground troops in Taiwan.Another article suggested that the U.S. military deploy four divisions and heavy equipment in Taiwan .Walker Mills's article attracted the attention of both the ruling and opposition parties of the Republic of China (Taiwan).Walker Mills, a researcher at the Institute of Communist Army and Warfare Concepts at the Institute for Defense Security, writes that "this bold proposal appeared in US military journals and has been considered inconceivable until now."Walker Mills' proposal amounts to a resumption of the Sino-US Joint Defense Treaty and a successful operational plan.In terms of division of operations, Taiwan is responsible for ground operations and the United States is responsible for air defense, naval surface operations and air attack operations.

In September 2020, Global Times, the official media of the People's Republic of China, published an editorial: "Re-entering Taiwan?That would mean war, " he said. "This discussion in the U.S. military magazine can be seen as part of a public opinion war with China, trying to open up new space for the U.S. strategy of pressure on China.If the U.S. military does so, it will not only mean the end of the one-China policy, but will also pose a blatant challenge to China's sovereignty.Such a release of information is self-defeating.We want to tell both sides that they have to give up any illusions about the redeployment of U.S. troops in Taiwan, because it must mean war."The "re-deployment of U.S. troops in Taiwan" accords with articles 2 and 3 of the three conditions set out in the Anti-Separate States Act for the adoption of military means to resolve the Taiwan question."We are confident that the PLA will then take military action to wage a just war for the liberation of Taiwan" .Wang Kun-yi, chairman and professor of international strategy at the Taiwan Institute of Strategic Studies, also points out that the realization of the U. S. military presence in Taiwan will lead to war and eventually "tens of millions of heads will fall."Wang's article in 2004 described "[the relocation of U.S. troops to Taiwan] as essentially tearing up the three Sino-U.S. joint communiques, leading not only to a cross-strait showdown but also to a break-up between China and the U.S.

On October 22 of the same year, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), an American think-tank, held a seminar in Washington.Former chairman of the Taiwan Association of the United States (AIT), Paul Breeze, said that the re-establishment of U.S.-China relations would undermine the conditions set for normalizing relations in the normalization of U.S.-China relations.

Republic of China

In late September 2020, a poll by the Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation found that 60% of Taiwanese adults over the age of 20 thought the U.S. might send troops to defend Taiwan when the People's Republic of China reunified with Taiwan.You Yinglong, chairman of the Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation, said the findings showed that the overwhelming majority of Taiwanese now believe the U.S. military could help defend Taiwan if China attacks Taiwan by force.In a October poll by ETtoday News Cloud, 54.0% of the population said the United States would defend Taiwan against military conflict, while 35.0% said the United States would not.55.7% of the population supported a more radical "US military presence in Taiwan to defend Taiwan", 30.7% did not support [38].According to a December poll, 48.0% of the population believed that U.S. President-elect Joe Biden would not defend Taiwan.But polls after the outbreak of the Russian-Ukraine war in March 2022 showed 55.9% of the population believed the United States would not defend Taiwan.

Zhang Ziyang, an associate professor at the Nanhua University , wrote in 2008 that "Taiwan's confidence in the U.S. defense of Taiwan comes from the misguided belief that Taiwan is of high strategic importance to the U.S.At the same time, "Taiwan's excessive confidence in US cooperation in defense" has allowed China to reasonably doubt whether the US has a secret commitment to Taiwan.In particular, the installation of long-range early warning radar makes Taiwan part of the U.S. early warning system, and China has even more reason to doubt whether the U.S. and Taiwan have secretly pledged to help each other secure each other's homeland.

February 19, 2021, in response to a proposal by the United States Congress for a bill to prevent aggression against Taiwan. Joanne Ou , spokesman for the ROC Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs felt that members of both houses of Congress and the House of Representatives of Jamie had taken various friendly actions.

People's Republic of China

edit

According to the author of the People's Republic of China, militarily, it will be only a matter of time before the People's Republic of China achieves its strategic objective of effectively preventing the United States from defending Taiwan.Other authors describe it politically as "a vital lifeline for Taiwan independence" and "a frequent misinformation from the international community, especially the United States."

In 2020, cross-strait relations and Sino-US relations continued to be strained.In September, Wang Shushen, director of the Taiwan Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, wrote that the DPP authorities, in addition to cooperating with the U.S. government and heightening tensions across the Taiwan Straits.[…] For Taiwan, the United States' fight for Taiwan's independence is an illusory fantasy.The U.S. sees Taiwan only as a tradable and sacrificeable piece." On October 6, the Kuomintang Legislative Yuan caucus introduced and passed two bills: "The government should request the United States to defend Taiwan against the Communists" and "Taiwan-US diplomatic resumption."In a commentary published by the People's Republic of China's state-run Global Network, it called the proposals 'promoting U.S. military cooperation to defend Taiwan' and 'restoration of diplomatic relations between Taiwan and the U.S.

A map of the distribution of U. S. military bases shows that there are more than 5,000 military bases, including 600 overseas bases.On the same day the PLA attacked Taiwan, U. S. troops stationed in Japan, South Korea and U. S. strategic bombers and fighter jets could help Taiwan.U.S. troops at Guam base can run as fast as three days.U.S. troops outside Hawaii can travel within a week or two.