Articles edit

As I read them I'm collecting articles on WP editing here as a reference sheet. Usually what happens is I remember something about an article but not the exact article. This page helps me track down the article while also organizing them.

Policy edit

Core Wikipedia policy edit

Official English Wikipedia policy edit

Guidelines edit

English Wikipedia content guidelines edit

English Wikipedia editing guidelines edit

Wikipedia notability guidelines edit

Wikipedia style guidelines edit

Wikipedia essays edit


User essays edit

Proposed Guidelines edit

General edit

These articles are not as organized as policy and guidelines. For example, there do not seem to be any categories related to them and it's not clear where they fall in the scheme of things.

Help edit

These articles are not as organized as policy and guidelines. For example, there do not seem to be any categories related to them and it's not clear where they fall in the scheme of things.

Deleting articles edit

Afd Survival guide edit

If you have something in mind that can establish that someone or something is notable then simply state the evidence on the AfD page. Most wikipedians want to keep the articles, but only if the subject is notable per WP:N. For example How To Be Bad being optioned is a good in that it's at least something though is not the sort of thing that will slam-dunk an article into the "keep" category. You may be interested in Wikipedia:How to save an article proposed for deletion and Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions.

You may be interested in WP:SAVE and WP:ATA.

Also, even if an article is deleted all is not lost. If you later run across solid evidence of notability then post the evidence on your user page so that the admins can see it and and ask that the article be undeleted citing the new evidence. See Wikipedia:Viewing and restoring deleted pages and Wikipedia:Undeletion policy. Note that you don't need to first post that solid evidence of notability but it will increase the odds greatly plus it means you'll have the material already set up to instantly drop into the restored article. Good luck.

  • Comment: I'm concerned that WP:BEFORE was not followed. The editor who created this page needs to be made aware of WP:BURDEN and WP:PEOPLE. It's a new editor, no need to WP:BITE him or her. Nominating editor, I would strongly encourage you to immediately withdraw the AfD and to give the editor creating this article a couple of weeks to say something. If he or she ignores you then WP:PROD.

Manually setting up an AfD edit

To add the xyzzy article to the AFD queue you would

  1. Hat xyzzy.
  2. Create Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/xyzzy or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/xyzzy (2nd nomination).
  3. Update WP:AFD/t by adding a line to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 12.
  4. Post user warnings.

In more detail this is
1. Hat xyzzy

<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->
{{AfDM|page=xyzzy|logdate=2009 September 9|substed=yes}}
<-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdfull|page=xyzzy|date=12 May 2024|result=keep}} -->
<-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
Alternative hats are:
{{subst:afd}}
{{subst:afdx}}

2. Create Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/xyzzy or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/xyzzy (2nd nomination)

Add this to the page
{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=P|text=Explain the nomination}}
Or you can add
===[[xyzzy]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
:{{la|xyzzy}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/xyzzy|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 September 9{{anchorencode:xyzzy}}|View log]])</noinclude>
:({{findsources|xyzzy}})
Explain the nomination ~~~~

3. Update WP:AFD/t by adding a line to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 12

{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/xyzzy)}}
{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/xyzzy (2nd nomination)}}
{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/xyzzy (3rd nomination)}}

4. Post user warnings

AfD nomination of [[xyzzy]]
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, [[xyzzy]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/xyzzy]]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> --~~~~
or for a 2nd nomination it would be
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, [[xyzzy]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/xyzzy (2nd nomination)]]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> --~~~~

Wikipedia Dispute Resolution edit

  1. Wikipedia:Requests for comment (WP:RFC)
  2. Wikipedia:Requests for mediation (WP:RFM)
  3. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests (WP:RFAR, WP:RFARB, WP:ArbReq, WP:A/R, [[formerly Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration)

Inline Templates edit

  • [Wikipedia:WikiProject Inline Templates]
  • {{ec}} Used on talk pages and adds (edit conflict)

Dealing with other editors edit

  • {{Welcome}} - Use as {{subst:welcome}} ~~~~ or {{subst:w}} ~~~~
  • {{Welcome-anon}} - Use as {{subst:welcome-anon}} ~~~~

Researching web sites edit

  • Special:LinkSearch generates a list of links to the specified external web site. Think of it as a What links there.
  • Google for site:en.wikipedia.org link:external-site.com though this is not as reliable as Special:LinkSearch.
  • http://www.alexa.com/ can be used to get rank numbers to see if a site may be "notable".

Dealing with problem users edit

Talk page templates edit

Tags for giving visual hints to readers of talk page items, making it easier to spot open, stalled, or resolved issues. It is hoped that the tags will encourage resolution of items on a talk page.

{{y}}  Y
{{n}}  N
{{Resolved}}
  Resolved
{{Unresolved}}
  Unresolved
{{Stale}}
  Stale
{{Stuck}}
  Stuck
{{Moved conversation}}
  Moved to

See Template:Check_mark/doc for a list of check and cross marks.

Need cleanup edit








Youtube[1]

[2]

WikiMedia / Wikipedia edit

After a brief spate of irritation about images for some of the pages I have an interest in being deleted or proposed for deletion I started to appreciate the process as I realized that many of these images and supporting text were unsourced/uncited resulting in a quiet "revision of history through good intentions" in that someone adds text/images to Wikipedia which later gets copied to other sites and then cited. That said - here are some links collected as I develop an interest in the process.

Wiki things I need to catch up on... edit

Core Policies edit

Shortcuts edit

Categories edit

Article block tags edit

Article tagging (in-line) edit

Category:Citation and verifiability maintenance templates edit
Inline templates edit
  • {{Cite quote}}, for "actual quotations" which need citations to make them proper
  • {{Page number}}, request a page number for an existing citation
  • {{List fact}}, request a citation of a source which justifies inclusion of a given entry in a list
  • {{Clarifyme}}, request clarification of wording or interpretation
  • {{Reference necessary}}, wrapper for a portion of a paragraph to highlight it as needing citation
Incomplete citations edit
  • {{Page needed}}, in-line request for the page number or page numbers in a work such as journal for an existing citation.
  • {{Season needed}}, similar to {{page needed}}, for missing TV season & episode number
  • {{Volume needed}}, similar to {{page needed}}, for missing journal, newspaper, comic, etc., volume and issue numbers)
Verification edit
Content edit
Article message box (hatting) templates edit
  • {{Unreferenced}}, article/section has no sources/references/citations given at all
  • {{Refimprove}}, article/section has weak or incomplete sources/references/citations
  • {{Citecheck}}, article/section may have inappropriate or misinterpreted citations
Category:Neutrality templates) edit

Templates edit

Other edit

Wiki tools edit

External Links edit

There are regular battles over if an external link is appropriate

Wikipedia Requests edit

Text formatting edit

  • The following do not work inside <nowiki>: * Unordered lists. # Ordered lists. Html <i>italics</i> or <b>bold</b>. Wikitext ''italics'' or '''bold'''. Line break with <br>. The only thing that seems to work are &code; characters.
  • Some versions of mediawiki do not seem to have a sandbox[3].
  • Some versions of MediaWiki do not support footnotes.

Irrationales edit

The entire Wikipedia rationale thing seems rather bogus with random robots nit picking away and people essentially creating boilerplate rationales to satisfy the robots as the actual instructions about what to do are so crappy. I've spent hours trying to understand the mumbo jumbo and as I upload images so rarely it's deja vue all over again which I try to figure out a rational rationale.

Speculative Fiction edit

Use Google

References edit

  1. ^ King, Stephen (January 01-05). It. Penguin. pp. 15–16. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  2. ^ Randalls, Jane (02-05-08). Yay. Publsiher. pp. 51–56. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  3. ^ See the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sandbox