This article aims to give an overview of centrist and moderate politics in Brazil often called the Third Way. It is limited to Third Way groupings and parties with significant impact on national politics, often demonstrated by national representation.
Though previously the Third Way was used to describe many types of ideologies in Brazil, it is now more used for politics in opposition or unaligned with the dominant forces of the left-wing Workers' Party and those of Jair Bolsonaro. Rather than being a solid ideology, it is a specific political identity.[1][2][3]
Introduction
editThe Third Way has been advocated by its proponents as a "radical-centrist" alternative to both capitalism and what it regards as the traditional forms of socialism, including Marxian and state socialism.[4] It advocates ethical socialism, reformism and gradualism that includes advocating the humanisation of capitalism, a mixed economy, political pluralism and liberal democracy.[5]
History
editThe idea of Brazilian Third Way begins with the foundation of the Brazilian Social Democracy Party (PSDB) in 1988.[6]
Beginings
editFounded Mário Covas and Fernando Henrique Cardoso (FHC), as an intellectual minority of the Brazilian Democratic Movement, the PSDB emerged as a party of urbanites and educated voters, supportive of democracy but concerned with political radicalism. [7]
The party stated that it "reject[s] populism and authoritarianism, as well as both fundamentalist neoliberalism and obsolete national-statism".[8] Its manifesto preached "democracy as a fundamental value" and "social justice as an aim to be reached". In its foundation, the party attempted to unite political groups as diverse as social democrats, social liberals, Christian democrats and democratic socialists.[9]
The ideas of the party, though associated with the neoliberalism, were opposed to the populism of Fernando Collor de Mello in the 1989 Brazilian presidential election.[9] Collor's election on a campaign of economic liberalization through privatization attempted to create greater economic equality.
After the Impeachment of Fernando Collor, President Itamar Franco appointed Cardoso Minister of Finance, implementing the Plano Real to combat hyperinflation. The success of this program saw Cardoso elected president in the first round in 1994.[10]
Split of the Third Way
editThe electoral success of Cardoso created an eventual split between the more economically statist and market forces in the movement. Cardoso's administration deepened the privatization program launched by president Fernando Collor de Mello. During his first term, several government-owned enterprises in areas such as steel milling, telecommunications and mining, such as Telebras and Companhia Vale do Rio Doce were sold to the private sector, the deepest denationalisation in Brazilian history, amidst a polarized political debate between "neoliberals" and "developmentalists".[11]
These economic interventionists, most notably the previous president Franco and Ciro Gomes, Cardoso's successor as Finance Minister, led to some of the mantle of the third way moving to other parties such as Brazilian Democratic Movement and the Popular Socialist Party. Gomes, who ran against Cardoso in 1998, expressed disatisfaction with the institutionalization of corruption, saying that "“Fernando Henrique does not steal, but lets others steal."[12]
Lulism
editAfter three failed attempts for the presidency, former syndicalist Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva attempted to capture the Third Way in the 2002 election through alliances with pro-business parties and the appoinment of executive José Alencar as Vice President.[13] Against Cardoso's Health Minister José Serra, Lula won a decisive victory, and implemented many of the economic positions of the developmentalist Third Way.[14] Lulism "concocted new ideological, under-union banners that seemed to combine" continuity of the Lula and Cardoso governments in macroeconomic policy based on three pillars, namely inflation control, a floating exchange rate and a budgetary surplus.[15]
Polarization
editThese embraces of previous PSDB policy forced the party towards the right, creating a two party system from 2006 to 2014, where the third way was viewed as an option other than Lula's Workers' Party or the PSDB.
Marina Silva
editMarina Silva, the former environment minister of Lula, emerged as the primary challenge to the PT and PSDB duopoly in national poltics in the early 2010s. Originally from Acre, she opposed the developmentalism of the Brazilian military dictatorship and the neodevelopmentalism of the PT administrations, but also supported business regulation, due to her environmentalism. Her particular appeal was to evangelicals, being the second evangelical candidate to achieve the top three in a Brazilian election.[16][17]
Silva, who achieved third place in the 2010 and 2014 elections, prioritized sustainable development and fiscal responsibility. Like many of the third way, her appeal was to unifying ideological factions rather than an ideological line. In the 2018 elections, Jair Bolsonaro usurped her evangelical support base and in the 2022 elections, she joined the Lulist Broad Front.[18]
Opposition to Bolsonaro
editWith the emergence of Jair Bolsonaro, the position of the Third Way in Brazilian politics returned to the Brazilian Social Democracy Party and its allies. It's candidate in 2018, Geraldo Alckmin, failed to gain traction, but in 2022, the primary Third Way candidate, Simone Tebet, achieved third place.
Economic views
editRelationship to neoliberalism
editWhile opposed to strident neoliberalism, as supported by the failed reforms of the Collor administration, right-leaning members of the third way movement are committed to free trade without ideological stridency and an emphasis on exports. The economic policy of the Cardoso administration was largely responsive to inflation and crisis rather than constructive of new systems.[10]
In modern Brazil, supporters of these views are often more urban and educated voters who advantage from economic liberalism but oppose social conservatism. A base of this support can be found in São Paulo, where the PSDB has significant historical impact.[19][20]
Opposition to developmentalism
editDevelopmentalism first emerged in Brazil through the military dictatorship and has been continued through left wing governments. Opposition to government control of business, whether that of right wing or left wing governments in common among third way movements.
Economic approaches
editDepending on the politicial movement, the economic approaches of Third Way politicians vary.
.JPG)
Lulism
editThe political position of Lulism has been described as conciliatory to the two views of economic theory in Brazil. Rather than opposing free markets, the goal of the policy was to combine a social focus on government sponsered development rather than regulation, as seen with European social democracy. The description of this challenge was laid out by left wing detractors opposed to markets and developmentalism such as Plínio de Arruda Sampaio Jr. who wrote in 2012, describing Lulism as neodevelopmentalism:[21]
The challenge of neodevelopmentalism is therefore to reconcile the “positive” aspects of neoliberalism—unconditional commitment to currency stability, fiscal austerity, the pursuit of international competitiveness, and the absence of any discrimination against international capital—and the “positive” aspects of old developmentalism—commitment to economic growth, industrialization, the regulatory role of the state, and social sensitivity.
Lulism emerged as conciliatory to market forces in Lula's first term but from 2006 onwards, the Workers' Party took a more ideologically leftist stance, especially under Lula's successor Rousseff.[22]
Social liberalism
editThe policy priorities of the Third Way have shifted towards social justice via market forces. Groups like Livres support politicans that prioritize feminist and socially liberal economic policies.[23]
Parties
editThe following parties broadly identify with the Third Way as a whole while other parties may have factions that identify with the political identity.
| Name | Leader | Ideology | |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
Brazilian Social Democracy Party | Marconi Perillo | Liberalism
Center |
 |
Podemos | Renata Abreu | Direct democracy
Center-right |
 |
Citizenship | Comte Bittencourt | Social liberalism
Center |
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ "Brazil election: 'Third way' candidates gain little ground against Lula and Bolsonaro". Le Monde.fr. 2022-09-28. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
- ^ "Brazil governor pitches third way between Bolsonaro and Lula in 2022 elections". www.ft.com. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
- ^ Stuenkel, Oliver (4 November 2021). "Why Lula vs. Bolsonaro in Brazil Leaves Little Room for Others". Americas Quarterly. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
- ^ Giddens, Anthony (1999). The third way: the renewal of social democracy. Malden, Mass: Polity Press. ISBN 978-0-7456-2266-8.
- ^ Giddens, Anthony (1994). Beyond left and right: the future of radical politics. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-2450-0.
- ^ Mainwaring, Scott (1992). "Brazilian Party Underdevelopment in Comparative Perspective". Political Science Quarterly. 107 (4): 677–707. doi:10.2307/2152290. ISSN 0032-3195.
- ^ Rocha, Camila (2021), Hatzikidi, Katerina; Dullo, Eduardo (eds.), "From Orkut to Brasília: the origins of the New Brazilian Right", A Horizon of (Im)possibilities, A Chronicle of Brazil’s Conservative Turn, University of London Press, pp. 81–102, ISBN 978-1-908857-89-7, retrieved 2024-07-16
- ^ Goldman, Alberto (18 May 2001). "Declaração Programática do Partido da Social Democracia Brasileira (Documento preliminar para discussão interna)" (PDF). Instituto de Iberoamérica. Retrieved 15 November 2014.
- ^ a b Bethell, Leslie (2018), "Populism in Brazil", Brazil: Essays on History and Politics, University of London Press, pp. 175–194, ISBN 978-1-908857-54-5, retrieved 2024-07-17
- ^ a b Power, Timothy J. (1998). "Brazilian Politicians and Neoliberalism: Mapping Support for the Cardoso Reforms, 1995-1997". Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs. 40 (4): 51–72. doi:10.2307/166454. ISSN 0022-1937.
- ^ Anuatti-Neto, Francisco; Barossi-Filho, Milton; Carvalho, Antonio Gledson de; Macedo, Roberto (April–June 2005). "Os efeitos da privatização sobre o desempenho econômico e financeiro das empresas privatizadas". Revista Brasileira de Economia (in Portuguese). 59 (2): 151–175. doi:10.1590/s0034-71402005000200001. ISSN 0034-7140.
- ^ "Folha Online - Brasil - FHC não rouba, mas deixa roubar, diz Ciro - 26/07/2000". www1.folha.uol.com.br. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
- ^ Boito, Armando; Fierro, Patrícia (2020). "Lulism, Populism, and Bonapartism". Latin American Perspectives. 47 (1): 134–151. ISSN 0094-582X.
- ^ Rohter, Larry (2002-10-28). "Leftist Handily Wins Brazilian Presidential Race". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
- ^ Singer, André (2009). "Raízes sociais e ideológicas do lulismo". Novos estudos CEBRAP (in Portuguese): 83–102. doi:10.1590/S0101-33002009000300004. ISSN 0101-3300.
- ^ Paraguassu, Lisandra; Brito, Ricardo (6 July 2018). "Marina Silva counts on Brazil anti-graft wave in threadbare campaign". Reuters.
- ^ Rogério, Paulo (8 October 2010). "From Brazil. The Election's Marina Phenomenon". Americas Quarterly. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
- ^ "Brazil's da Silva endorsed by another former rival". AP News. 2022-09-12. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
- ^ Czymmeck, Anja; Costa, Ariane (2021). Zwischen Bolsonaro und Lula – Brasilien auf der Suche nach einem „dritten Weg“ (Report). Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
- ^ Pagliarini, Andre (2024-07-24). "The Future of Brazilian Politics Will Be Decided in São Paulo". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
- ^ Sampaio Jr., Plínio de Arruda (2012). "Desenvolvimentismo e neodesenvolvimentismo: tragédia e farsa" [Developmentalism and new developmentalism: tragedy and farce]. Serviço Social & Sociedade (in Portuguese) (112): 46. doi:10.1590/S0101-66282012000400004. ISSN 0101-6628.
- ^ Singer, André; Purdy, Sean (2020). "The Failure of Dilma Rousseff's Developmentalist Experiment: A Class Analysis". Latin American Perspectives. 47 (1): 152–168. ISSN 0094-582X.
- ^ "Plano de modernizar Brasil foi interrompido pelo PT e abandonado por tucanos, diz Elena Landau". Folha de S.Paulo (in Brazilian Portuguese). 2024-06-13. Retrieved 2024-07-17.