Template talk:Japan nuke plant map
 | Energy Template‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | Japan Template‑class | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | This template was considered for deletion on 5 September 2012. The result of the discussion was "rename". |
Active, not active edit
It may be useful, depending on how crowded it gets, to list active reactors in red (what's currently being used), and inactive/closed reactors in black. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- I've already been using a different color for closed reactors in other nations. But Japan only has one closed nuclear reactor and it's right next to (or the exact same site) as another, currently operating, reactor. That's why there's a marker for the future plants and not the closed ones. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 05:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- That works. Perhaps one color for currently operating plants, and one for future plants. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Kaminoseki NPP location edit
Kaminoseki NPP location is marked incorrectly, it needs to be moved north to the southern tip of Yamaguchi Prefecture. See this page for co-ords > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaminoseki,_Yamaguchi & this map for proof, if you want it > http://www2.jnes.go.jp/atom-db/en/general/atomic/ke02a13/images/map_p.gif
I'm no good with this sort of thing, so I wont try to edit it myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.10.33 (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Fukushima I status edit
Marking Fukushima I as “active” is somewhat cynical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.224.155.22 (talk) 08:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Am I missing something, or are the colors for 'active' and 'suspended operations' switched? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.195.40.197 (talk) 20:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC)