Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Sealo's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2013 (UTC).

Sealo

edit

Created by Bonkers The Clown (talk). Self nominated at 07:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC).


  • This might make a good April Fool's DYK. --BDD (talk) 01:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Now that you mention it... Maybe. Yes, maybe. If I wanted to, do I have to transfer this to a holding area or something? ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 04:06, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
  • After it's reviewed, but not until then. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Interesting article, interesting hook, long enough, (mostly) well sourced, etc. I did find one minor issue, that should be easy to fix in time for the 1st: "and was frequently exaggerated as a human with a seal body on promotional sideshow posters" is documented by a source that says this happened only two times, so this needs either rephrasing or better sourcing. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:34, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Great, thanks, good to go (or in this case, good to be shunted off to a holding area?). —David Eppstein (talk) 14:51, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
  • I have serious problems with this prompt. While the terminology "freak" was accepted at the time, it's inappropriate now. I would rather it run with something along the lines of "... that a seal boy broke into performance art after scouts found him selling newspapers?" It's just as weird as the first one, but with different terminology. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
I suppose it's not the most respectful language. But it's in line with article titles such as freak and freak show. --BDD (talk) 22:46, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Agree with BDD. That was the name of his profession... and still is. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2013 (UTC)