Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth Taubert Seeger

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Ruth Taubert Seeger edit

Created by Z105space (talk). Self-nominated at 21:02, 8 May 2016 (UTC).

  • Great article, great hook. Length, date of nom, QPQ, and sourcing check out. No copyvio detected. --Al Ameer (talk) 17:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Z105space I pulled this out of Prep. The hook is a copyvio, word-for-word from the source. Please write a new hook. The new hook needs a new reviewer, and it wouldn't hurt for the new reviewer to check the rest of the article against the sources. — Maile (talk) 23:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Well, I kept hoping someone would re-review this now that you had written new hooks. And here it's been 10 days since you did that. Reticking with the turn-around so someone can notice and review your new hooks. Sorry it's taking so long. — Maile (talk) 19:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT1 and ALT3 could be used as both have inline citations to a reliable source. However they do not really do justice to this athlete. How about
  • Somebody else will be needed to review it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  • This hook is the most interesting of all and free of paraphrasing. To do a full review again – article is long enough, was nominated on the same day as creation, QPQ done, hook is verified by inline citations. Good to go. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:45, 29 May 2016 (UTC)