The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:50, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Aarhus edit

Aarhus waterfront

  • ... that Aarhus (waterfront pictured) is the second-largest city in Denmark?
  • Reviewed: Not a self-nomination

Improved to Good Article status by Dr. Blofeld (talk), RhinoMind (talk), Ipigott (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 00:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC).

  • Meets the criteria. But the hook should be more clear. By "second-largest", you mean population-wise or size-wise? Vensatry (ping) 18:28, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the review. It's by population; below is an alternative formulation. Oceanh (talk) 20:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
  • ALT1: ... that the city of Aarhus (waterfront pictured) is the second-most populous urban area in Denmark?
Hook is not riveting (it's in the number one position for many things so why pick a number two); there's plenty of more interesting facts to choose from, for example:
ALT1 ...that Aarhus (pictured) became Århus in 1948 and in 2010 it became Aarhus again?
ALT2 ...that, in 1944, a precision bombing raid on the Gestapo headquarters in Aarhus (pictured) destroyed all their files?
ALT3 ...that Aarhus (pictured) in the north of Denmark has an Eastern-inspired bazaar?

(I find the article's mix of translations and the original Danish names for place names weird, but that is not a DYK matter) Belle (talk) 10:45, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

@Oceanh: Belle has got some interesting hooks. Would you consider any of those? Vensatry (ping) 17:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Sure, they are all good. You may choose whichever you like. Oceanh (talk) 17:26, 8 August 2014 (UTC)