 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Hello, edit
I saw you left a note on the Wikiproject Musical Instruments. Are you wanting to work with someone on musical instrument articles?Jacqke (talk) 23:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
References edit
Hi. I'm a regular Wikipedia editor. The text from what I read looks pretty good. I started working on the WP:LEDE that summarizes what is in the article. Right now the main thing that needs work, is that you need WP:references to more of the sentences in the WP:BODY. Ideally, if you could have at least one ref per sentence that would be great. If two or three sentences are all connected and based on material all form the same source, then it's okay to just put the one ref at the end. I hope that helps. If you reuse the same reference, I can show you how to do that. Just ping me with the question or ask on my talk page.
Your references do seem to be reliable, although I'm a bit unsure about this[1] one.
- ^ Sports Engineering and Computer Science : proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Sport Science and Computer Science (SSCS 2014), Singapore, 16-17 September 2014 & the 2014 International Conference on Biomechanics and Sports Engineering (BSE 2014), Riga, Latvia, 24-25 October, 2014. Luo, Qi,, International Conference on Sport Science and Computer Science (2014 : Singapore), International Conference on Biomechanics and Sports Engineering (2014 : Riga, Latvia). Boca Raton, FL. ISBN 9781315755717. OCLC 910237206.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
If you need more, I like to use Google Scholar. In your case, some good articles come up with this search. Universities and libraries have other search engines that return more scholarly articles than regular Google. Although it is acceptable to use books from the library or bookstore, it's always nice to be able to click on a link and be able to read the text directly. Foreign books or reliable websites are also acceptable, but keep in mind that this is the English encyclopedia, so if you can provide an equally reliable and quality source in English or a translation of the Chinese, that would be better than the Chinese or other foreign language version.
--David Tornheim (talk) 02:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)