This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I added the Nat'l Register categories, even though the Nat'l Monument categories are already sub-cats of the Nat'l Register ones. The reason is that the above mentioned category structure is not logically correct. Not all National Monuments are on the register, only historical ones administered by the NPS. For example, Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument is correctly listed in Category:National Monuments in Hawaii but it is not on the National Register (a natural site, and not NPS administered). "World War II Valor" is a Nat'l Monument that was automatically added to the register. — Eoghanachttalk21:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
It was reasonable to expect that this history-oriented National Monument would be listed on the National Register, but it apparently has not been, as it does not appear in the NRIS database (which would include it by now). I am now deleting the various NRHP categories from this article. The NM appears NOT to be NRHP-listed. doncram (talk) 19:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
This is an brand new umbrella monument and as such it is not in the register. But all its individual units are. Do you think the categories would be appropriate or should they stick to the units only? --h-stt!?12:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply