Talk:World Rugby (video game)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Nick in topic Requested moves
Requested moves
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved per discussion. Nick (talk) 00:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
– The governing body of rugby union (the International Rugby Board) will change its name to World Rugby from 19 November 2014. Since the governing body would become the primary topic, I propose the moves above to reflect this. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 15:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support. World Rugby doesn't seem like it was a particularly popular game, so I don't think we'll be stepping on too many toes. Grande (talk) 17:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support as above. Stickee (talk) 00:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support Asturkian (talk) 00:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Oppose for now -- at the moment they IRB (or World Rugby) haven't even updated their website (http://www.irb.com/). IRB is still the common name for now, so how about we give it some time before making the move. No rush to do it so quickly. At least wait until "World Rugby" have themselves done some major rebranding and revamping before we start. Hopefully won't take them long. I'll support once the IRB has done this (or at least started).-- Shudde talk 01:52, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Shudde - It now has redirected and rebranded the entirety of its website. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 17:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Cheers. Of course it gets updated almost straight after my comment! Struck. The website needs some work, has gems such as "Traditionally the World Rugby has been a regulator and an investor in World Rugby"! -- Shudde talk 21:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Zarcadia (talk) 23:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Oppose for now per WP:CRYSTAL; just use a disambiguation hatnote. If and when the name change occurs, then yes, move the article. But a rename proposal (in the real world) of this sort might not go as planned, and we shouldn't try to predict the future. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 23:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Support: Just noticed the change has already happened in the real world. Hurr durr... — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 23:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.