Talk:Women 2.0

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge from Shaherose Charania edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

@Virgilia.singh, Turtledragon, VQuakr, Marylee58, Edward321, and Orangeart19: The article Shaherose Charania has little substance related to notability outside Women 2.0 and its offshoot Founder Labs (which, at the time I write this, lacks an article), and I therefore propose to "merge" it to Women 2.0. "Merge" seems to be the accepted term even when an article is simply turned into a redirect and nothing is copied into the destination article, and it's this that I propose to do. (Incidentally, see this on WP:COIN about the authorship of the Shaherose Charania article.) -- Hoary (talk) 23:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

No exception taken to the redirect. @Hoary: should the notability on this page be reviewed as well? At a glance the sourcing looks pretty week, but I haven't done a substantial WP:BEFORE check. VQuakr (talk) 00:35, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I suspect that you're right, VQuakr. But I don't have a background in this kind of subject and thus am reluctant to evaluate this article. -- Hoary (talk) 00:39, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've implemented the redirect. (VQuakr, you're welcome to evaluate the worth of this article too.) -- Hoary (talk) 21:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic